IFS Solutions

 When adding a reference field, the link provided doesn’t work to navigate to the proper page. When clicking on the Order No we go toAnd when clicking on the customer_no we go the customer page with no filter  The entity is configured as follows :    and some times, the refrence field doesn’t show a link and is show as plain unedited text. any idea why? Thank you in advance any help would be apretiated ​@kamnlk ​@dsj 

I am curious if IFS has any demos or documentation that could be sent to me that covers the basic purpose and function of the Document Management module in Cloud. If not, does IFS record their webinars? If so, can they be sent out to customers? Specifically I'd like to be able to view the IFS Apps 10 - IFS Document Management Overview & Demo from July 9, 2020, as I'm sure it would still be largely applicable for Cloud.

Hi Community,When a CTO part is to be delivered from inventory, supply code is Invent Order and part is reserved by selecting Configuration and Find Existing. However, if Project is connected to the order line before reservation, it’s not possible to reserve. If reserved first, it’s not possible to connect to Project.Have tested by connecting and not connecting the part to Project under Inventory Part in Stock. Have also tested by selecting other supply codes like Project Inventory and Project Deliverables.Does anyone know if there is a way to do this?

I’ve got a WO to which I’ve tied a NO CO to the header and set the CO Type to NO on the task.I have issued a part to the WO and I want to invoice the customer for that. I’m not seeing anything relating to Transfer to Customer Order.  Can you help here?   I’ve tried using an SEO and I’ve tried to create the CO from the WO, which is does but still can’t see how to transfer this to CO.  

Hii, When a user removes the authorization on particular day in time card he is getting error “ Indirect labor transaction 2583939  has already been cancelled once””. Can anyone help to resolve this ??  Error  

I need some advice regarding capture cost sources when we copy SET 2 to SET 1. 

 What is preventing this transfer from being completed / how do we find out what is preventing the transfer from being completed?When attempting an engineering revision transfer we are getting this warning. This is preventing us from completing the transfer. When we go to Eng Transfer History this is the transfer description we have. What is preventing this transfer from being completed / how do we find out what is preventing the transfer from being completed? 

I have seen that there is already a “Component Repair Order to handle Configured Parts” topic, but is there any feasible process in IFS as of today for repairing a configured part that has once been delivered to customer?Buy/take into stock from owning customer Some sort of repair order (multilevel, dissasembly/assembly) etc Delivery to customer againHow would IFS recommend us to use the system for repairs/overhauls if we produce them as configured?/ Kenneth

In Apps10 how can I keep the sticky notes visible but not editable? I have tried to “grant query” on the presentation object EE_NOTES_CONFIG. But I can still edit.And if I do not grant EE_NOTES_CONFIG at all, the notes are not visible.I have tried it also in combination with the activity ManageNotes granted or not. But with no luck. The presentation object sais Read Only Allowed. So why is it not working? Thank you!Catherine

Hi ALl, Doing a project in 24R1 where I see some strange behaviour and wondering if we are dealing with a bug. Situation:I have a Work Task where I need to assign a person to the Work Task using a Resource group (Resource Type = ‘Person). Standard allocation against the Resource demand works as expected, but I am also trying to use ‘Direct Allocation’. And I noticed that not all of my Resources are showing in the drop down list. Initially I didn’t even see any. So I’ve been trying to debug and investigate and I’ve found the cause of the issue but now I am wondering if this is a bug or ‘functionality as intended’. And if it is ‘functionality as intended’ - what would be the idea behind that way of working because I can’t imagine why this would work like this. So what I have found out is:Direct Allocation does not take into account persons belonging to the top Resource Group, only from subgroups. And I have no idea why this would work like that. I am trying to make sense out of this but

Hello, I’ve created a few distribution orders to move some parts from Site A to Site B. The multiple parts were all added to the same PO/CO and all looks good. On Site B, I can see the released PO and the lines are available on the register arrivals page. Of course, I cannot receive the lines until the customer order on Site A is delivered. That’s all fine, but when I try to peg material lines on a shop order at Site B, the corresponding lines from the released PO are not displayed. Is this intended behavior or am I missing a step somewhere? Thanks for your help,Dylan

I have created templates for safety inspections and i am struggling to share the templates with other usersI thought i would copy the entry in the profile but when i look i cannot find the entry in my personal profile. like it was in apps 8Has anyone got a work instruction please?

Hello,My customer has this error message when he tries to issue a reserved material line : “ The quantity reserved for part XXX on site XXX at location XXX should not be negative.” Thanks for your help. 

Inventory cost not match with RM cost in inventory transactions history. Since this part is a semi finish good there are no charges included. Transaction Code Transaction Description Part No Location No Cost Quantity UoM Order Ref 1 Order Type Inventory Cost Total Cost BACFLUSH Backflush Component for Shop Order RAV13256 STM2-FL-MAT 2.2894 2.161178 kg ME24101985 Shop Order 4.9478 4.9478 BACFLUSH Backflush Component for Shop Order RCB11011 STM2-FL-MAT 0.4983 151.8999 kg ME24101985 Shop Order 75.6983 75.6983 BACFLUSH Backflush Component for Shop Order RCB11330 STM2-FL-MAT 1.1296 40.4449 kg ME24101985 Shop Order 45.6866 45.6866 BACFLUSH Backflush Component for Shop Order RCH30013 STM2-CHEM 1.7406 50.94206 kg ME24101985 Shop Order 88.6675 88.6675 BACFLUSH Backflush Component for Shop Order RNB12001 STM2-FL-MAT 0.8718 30.25649 kg ME24101985 Shop Order 26.379 26.379 B

Hello, We are looking to improve manufacturing cost estimates and cost reporting through IFS. We primarily design and fabricate custom systems with job-unique BOMs. We are not using DOP at the moment, but have it on the radar in the future. On the shop order costs page, we can see estimated and actual material, labor, machine, etc. costs. Until items are issued or operations are reported, the actual cost is $0. Thus, the estimated cost can be useful. An issue with the estimated cost is that it is $0.00 for new items that don’t have a history in the system. Even once these new items are received into inventory and there is an inventory unit cost, the estimated material cost field on the Inventory Part Unit Cost page still shows $0. Thus, other than our interconnecting piping, fittings, etc. that are used on every job, our estimated cost is completely missing. We can add a CRIM to update the estimated material cost field after material receipt, but it seems that this field gets filled in

I just created a new site in our IFS 10 environment.When checking the basic data in costing, I found, that UPD 21 has several new Costing parameters . Unforturneately, IFS documentation Define Cost Parameters https://server/documentation/en/Costing/ActivityDefineCostParameters.htm only describes some of the parameters.I had a look in the latest doc of 24R2 (https://docs.ifs.com/ifsclouddocs/24r2/Costing/ActivityDefineCostParameters.htm  which is lacking a description of most of the parameters as well.These are new parameters in IFS 10, or in some of IFS 10 Updates.Parameter CodeCAPTURE_COST_SOURCESCOPY_APPROVED_PARTSCOPY_SUBCONTRACT_COSTSCOPY_SUPP_DELOHCOPY_WC_LC_COSTSINCLUDE_COMPONENTSINCLUDE_CONFIGURABLEINCREMENTAL_COPYUPD_INV_EST_MTRL_COST Can anybody provide a complete explanation about the system effects of every parameter available, not only the description what is in the application.

Hey all !  Just wondering if there is a way to restrict Force wrap up on certain agents ? 

Hoping some one can help, when I run the following code in PL/SQL developer it runs without an issue - however when I put the same code into an IAL no records are created.  Why would that be please ? With Rowsnum As (Select to_char(dt,'dd/mm/yyyy') dt, row_number() Over( Order by dt) rnFrom (  SELECT ifsapp.cd_user_util_api.get_previous_period_end_date(sysdate) -366+ level dt  from   dual connect by level <= ifsapp.cd_user_util_api.get_previous_period_end_date(sysdate)       - (ifsapp.cd_user_util_api.get_previous_period_end_date(sysdate)-366)) rws where  to_char ( dt, 'fmday', 'nls_date_language = English'  ) = 'monday'),RqdParts As (select part_no, ifsapp.Inventory_Part_API.Get_Description(CONTRACT,PART_NO) part_description, ContractFROM ifsapp.Inventory_Partwhere contract Not In ('CPH','CTM','VMS','CGP') --and part_no In ('WMPI10067','500086536','WSBB10501','WMVA10007')and Nvl(Substr(ifsapp.Inventory_Part_API.Get_Accounting_Group(contract,part_no),1,2),'Y') Not In ('IS','PH'))sel

 In Part Master Data > Revisions and Attributes>Part RevisionWas there a change in IFS at some point that auto-populates the Revision No into the Revision Text field? We use revision text occasionally for a different piece of part master meta data and now seeing a system generated value in this field is causing issues and confusion.   

Different customers ordering same Part No - but needing handling unit quantities to be different Is there a way to accomplish with SAME Part No? 

Hi, I’m trying to get the warehouse inventory list using a bearer token, I’m using ‘IFS Database’ as an identity provider. I got my access token like this : Then I used it like this :   But I’m getting a 401 error, I tried to use the id_token instead of the access_token but I get the same thing. Am I missing something? Thanks.

Hello, Our client is working with PSO integrated with Cloud. They have this scenario: An task is cancelled, but must be in some cases opened again. They don’t want to create a new task instead of the old one, since it takes too much time and they have many requirements in a day.Did anyone have a similar requirement or do you have any ideas? As far as I know and have tested, a cancelled task cannot be reponed. Thank you very much,Iulia 

When a user who has the access to this screen tries to open it, it fails to load with this error. I have tested this with another user account with the same permissions, etc and I can access the screen and do a search. I have tried going to this screen with debug console on with the user account that fails to load it, and nothing is output to the console.IFS 10 update 21, hosted internally.Any ideas what could be wrong please for this one user? Thanks  

Hi,In Trust Center - IFS under the section “Customer Security in the Cloud”, there the following document is available, dated 30/08/2023.https://www.ifs.com/-/media10/Project/IFS/IFS/Assets/Trust%20Center/IFS%20Cloud%20Services%20Controls.pdfUnfortuneately, Screenshot on page 5 (IFS Cloud Architecture Diagramm) is of unreadable quality.Is it possible to update this or provide it directly? Kind regards Johannes

Hi there, Can anyone please point me to the permission that controls access to this option in the Automatic Tax Proposal screen?I've looked all over and can't seem to pinpoint the permission responsible! Thanks!