Once a Serial Object is created and its status is changed, its prevented from getting deleted due to having a historical row. Is there a particular functional reason for preventing the deletion of serial objects when it has more than one historical record? It can be deleted if its status has not been changed.
Page 1 / 1
I agree a status change shouldn’t lock it in, but I’d argue a transaction against it would probably be a better way. For now, I’d just move it to a virtual boneyard and make the new one.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.