Once a Serial Object is created and its status is changed, its prevented from getting deleted due to having a historical row. Is there a particular functional reason for preventing the deletion of serial objects when it has more than one historical record? It can be deleted if its status has not been changed.
This topic has been closed for comments
Userlevel 5
+13
I agree a status change shouldn’t lock it in, but I’d argue a transaction against it would probably be a better way. For now, I’d just move it to a virtual boneyard and make the new one.
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.