Skip to main content

If a component i.e. “AG-TF-SUB-02“ is defined as “Not consumed“ in product structure and is driven by Master Scheduling and the assembly i.e “AG-TF-SUB-01“ which contain “AG-TF-SUB-02“ is driven by Master Scheduling it isn't recognized the  “Not Consumed“ Status of Component AG-TF-SUB-02 and demand for “Not Consumed“ Component Part was created.

 

Would like to know your opinion about this behavior. 

 

Product Structure AG-TF-SUB-1

 

 

Master Schedule AG-TF-SUB-1

This is correct

 

Master Schedule AG-TF-SUB-02

Is this the expected behavior ?

 

Subsequent MRP of Parts work as expected.

This is seen in APPs10

Hi Tharindu;

MRP seems working bit different to this, so please send a task to manufacturing for further investigation.

Hi,

It seems like a strange scenario where an unconsumed component is Master Scheduled! When “doing Master  Scheduling” for sub assemblies and purchase parts it is typically for critical ones with long lead times, where you want to start procurement ahead of your actual demands.

But anyway, it smells like a bug.

Cheers,

Mats

@dameenda  and @majose thank you both for your responses. I have raised a task to RnD now. 

Reply


Terms & ConditionsCookie settings