Skip to main content
Solved

Manufacturing Cost Allocation and Update Processed Transactions

  • Mar 18, 2025 1:15 PM UTC
  • 5 replies
  • 152 views

matt.watters
Ultimate Hero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+26

In the 24R2 documentation:

The Update Processed Transactions section in the ‘About MCA’ page reads:

“All inventory parts, no matter of inventory valuation method, will have their labor and operation transactions costs adjusted from this command.”

The Update Processed Transactions activity in 5.5.9.1 Manufacturing Cost Allocation reads:

“The transactions of only inventory parts that are having Weighted Average setting in the inventory valuation method of the Inventory Part page will be updated from this update processed transactions command.”

EDIT: I figured out what the documentation was stating.

Best answer by matt.watters

Dear Matt,

Can you explain you findings.

Regards

Just that transactions for standard costed parts will not be updated but new variance postings would be created.

View original

5 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Do Gooder (Partner)
  • Oct 30, 2025 8:45 AM UTC

Dear Matt,

Can you explain you findings.

Regards


matt.watters
Ultimate Hero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+26
  • Author
  • Ultimate Hero (Partner)
  • Answer
  • Oct 30, 2025 10:37 AM UTC

Dear Matt,

Can you explain you findings.

Regards

Just that transactions for standard costed parts will not be updated but new variance postings would be created.


Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Do Gooder (Partner)
  • Oct 30, 2025 10:59 AM UTC

Thanks Matt for the explanation. By any chance do you any document for this functionality other than standard Help.

Regards


matt.watters
Ultimate Hero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+26
  • Author
  • Ultimate Hero (Partner)
  • Oct 30, 2025 2:06 PM UTC

Thanks Matt for the explanation. By any chance do you any document for this functionality other than standard Help.

Regards

Unfortunately I do not.


Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Do Gooder (Partner)
  • Nov 2, 2025 12:39 PM UTC

No issue Matt. Once again thanks for making things clear for me.

Regards.