Skip to main content
Question

Fraud protection in IFS — how are teams handling AP fraud risk?

  • March 13, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 48 views

Hi everyone,

I wanted to start a conversation around fraud protection in and around IFS, particularly in the accounts payable and supplier payment process.

As more organizations continue to digitize finance workflows, it seems like fraud risk is becoming more sophisticated — especially around things like:

  • supplier bank detail changes

  • invoice fraud and impersonation

  • email compromise / payment redirection

  • breakdowns in approval workflows

  • limited visibility across AP activity

I’m interested in hearing how others in the IFS community are approaching this.

Are you relying mainly on internal controls within IFS, or are you also using additional tools and processes to help detect and prevent fraud before payments go out?

At Traild, we focus specifically on helping finance teams strengthen fraud controls around AP by adding visibility, auditability, and verification into payment-related workflows. I’m curious whether others here are seeing similar challenges and what solutions or practices have been effective in your environments.

A few questions for the group:

  1. What are the biggest fraud risks you’re seeing in your IFS-related AP process today?

  2. How are you managing supplier change verification and payment control?

  3. Are you confident your current approval workflows would catch a sophisticated fraud attempt?

  4. Have you added any external fraud prevention or AP control layers alongside IFS?

Would love to hear what’s working, what gaps still exist, and how others are thinking about this.

Thanks!

1 reply

Michael Kaiser
Sidekick (Customer)
Forum|alt.badge.img+9
  • Sidekick (Customer)
  • March 23, 2026

Hi Jeff,
very intersting topic!
Perhaps a minor thing but I just want to add a bit of information:
In IFS you have a customer centered payment term and also a customer order related one.
In most of the cases the stay the same.
Now: Imagine the following:
PT 30: 30 days.
PT 90: 90 days. 
If your NetAmount is 1000 $, ok but if it is 100.000 and even if it is minor measure what if…
Purchase guy from your customer and sales guy from your company have an “agreement”.
You give me a better PT and you will get cards for the next super bowl.
Perhaps this will be more a compliance issue? 

Never name a problem without  - at least an idea of - an idea:
Just imagine a list with the following data:
OrderNo, CustomerNo, ProductNo, PT CO, PT from Customer Record, SalesRep, etc.
filtered by (PT CO <> PT Customer) 
It isn’t hard to calculate the amount of loss when you get your money not after 30 days but 90 days.

The first time I crossed that requirement it was a company in switzerland with nearly one billion yearly turnover. 

HTH
Michael