Skip to main content

In Apps9 we can quickly create object connections between a document revision and multiple objects (for example several Shop Orders). When adding a row in the Objects tab in Document Revision window the Connect Object dialog appears and I can choose an Object type and then search and select multiple rows to connect to the document revision.

I can’t find this functionality in Aurena (Cloud), hope someone could help me!

Hi @Joho 

You cannot do that yet in Aurena, You have to add them one by one.

 

Thanks


@Joho,

Good question, it was indeed a nice feature. Hopefully that will be available soon in Aurena.

Are you aware of the Object Connection Transformation functionality? I am not sure what document you want to attach to the Shop Order, but you can show the documents connected to a part or a site to the Shop Order as well. that requires only one attachment on that level and it will show on other levels as well. Maybe that helps as well.

 

@Amila Samarasinghe, do you know when this option will be in Aurena? Quick Object Connections are required for more customers.

 

BR,

 

Robert


@Mathias Dahl any input regarding this?

 

Thanks


We recently added support for connecting one object to multiple document revisions but there is still no way to connected multiple objects (of the same type) to one document revision in one go.
 


@Amila Samarasinghe and @Mathias Dahl, thank you for your answers even if it unfortunately wasn’t the answer I was hoping for. 

@EqeRobertK, yes I’m aware of the Object Connection Transformation functionality but we have several cases when it can’t replace the possibility to connected multiple objects to one document revision in one go.


@Joho I suggest you have a look at the Ideas section here to see if this has been requested for before. If not, you can create an idea there.

 


I see this idea is set to solved. Can we please know which release this will be possible in? :)

 

 


I see this idea is set to solved. Can we please know which release this will be possible in? :)

I wonder if this idea was closed by mistake... 😢

@diwelk Can you comment?

 


This idea is open.

 


My bad. I guess someone set this "question" as solved because of my answer...


Reply