+8We are upgrading a client to 25R2.
I notice that there are some Permission issues which need to be resolved by amending the Projection Actions permissions on the Projection Action grants.
Currently these are being identified through user testing after which the amendment to the projection takes place.
Was there an easier to identify these changes (rather than rely on user testing) ?
Best answer by ashen_malaka_ranasinghe
Hi
There isn’t a built-in feature in IFS Cloud that automatically identifies all missing projection action permissions prior to execution. However, this can be improved by using tools such as “Manage Grants by Command” to align permissions with UI actions, analyzing projections via “Manage by Page/Navigator”, and leveraging DevTools or log tracing to identify missing actions more proactively. Combining these with structured functional test scenarios significantly reduces the dependency on user-driven testing during upgrades.
+14Hi
There isn’t a built-in feature in IFS Cloud that automatically identifies all missing projection action permissions prior to execution. However, this can be improved by using tools such as “Manage Grants by Command” to align permissions with UI actions, analyzing projections via “Manage by Page/Navigator”, and leveraging DevTools or log tracing to identify missing actions more proactively. Combining these with structured functional test scenarios significantly reduces the dependency on user-driven testing during upgrades.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.