Skip to main content
Question

Supplier for one PO

  • March 25, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 32 views

Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Do Gooder (Customer)

Hello,

 

I keep running into the problem that I only need to place a single order with a supplier. If I create a new supplier every time I do this, the number of suppliers in IFS quickly shoots up.

 

Is there a way to create a ‘dummy’ supplier that I can adapt each time I want to place a new order?

 

The ‘one-off supplier’ function isn’t suitable here.

1 reply

Forum|alt.badge.img+7
  • Do Gooder (Partner)
  • April 2, 2026

Hi ​@Josef ,

This is a common scenario  — but using a single “dummy supplier” that you keep changing is not recommended in IFS Cloud / IFS Apps.

 Why a “dummy supplier” is risky

Using one supplier and modifying it each time can cause:

  • ❌ Loss of historical accuracy (who you actually bought from)
  • ❌ Incorrect audit / compliance data
  • ❌ Issues with:
    • Accounting
    • Tax / VAT
    • Supplier statistics
  • ❌ Confusion in reporting

 In short: it breaks traceability

 Recommended Approaches

 Option 1: Use a Generic “Misc Supplier” (Controlled way)

You can create one supplier like:

  • MISC_SUPPLIER / ONE_TIME_SUPPLIER

 But:

  • Do NOT overwrite master data each time
  • Instead:
    • Use:
      • Address fields
      • Reference fields
      • Notes

To store:

  • Actual supplier name
  • Contact details
  • Invoice reference

 Option 2: Minimal Supplier Creation (Best Practice)

Instead of full master data:

  • Create supplier with:
    • Minimal required fields only
  • No need to fully configure everything

 This keeps:

  • Data clean
  • Audit correct

 Option 3: Supplier Request / Approval Process

  • Allow quick creation of:
    • Temporary suppliers
  • With:
    • Approval workflow

 Keeps control + avoids duplication

🔹 Option 4: Reuse Supplier with Multiple Addresses

If applicable:

  • One supplier → multiple addresses
  • Use address to differentiate

 But only if:

  • Same legal entity

 About “One-Off Supplier”

You mentioned it’s not suitable — that’s fine, but:

 That feature is actually designed for:

  • Exactly this use case

If it doesn’t fit, usually it’s because:

  • Process/config needs adjustment

 Best Practice Recommendation

✔️ Avoid changing supplier master repeatedly
✔️ Either:

  • Use controlled “misc supplier”
  • Or create minimal new suppliers