Skip to main content
Question

Planning Method don't take Onhand Qty into consider

  • December 10, 2024
  • 3 replies
  • 68 views

Yoda Sebastian
Do Gooder (Customer)
Forum|alt.badge.img+2

Planning Method?

For MRP to Create Shop Order Requisitions that dont take into hand whats avb(onhand) in stock 

We Run a Finished Goods Item that have the product structure of  required X amount of another Semi Finished Goods

Some times Production get more from the shop order and we are not “allowed” to use that next day


So i want when Creating Finished Goods then running MRP i only want Shop Order Requisitions for the semi finished goods that is exact like QTY required from the Finished Goods  and not Required - Onhand = Shop Order Requisition

Abdul
Superhero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+12
  • Superhero (Partner)
  • December 10, 2024

Hi ​@Yoda Sebastian,

There is no such Planning Method available which specifically exclude On-Hand stock with MRP.

Alternative option is, create an Availability Control Id and set Part Supply Control option to Non Nettable

Link same Availability Control Id with your desired On-Hand stock before running MRP.

 

Regards

Abdul Rehman


Yoda Sebastian
Do Gooder (Customer)
Forum|alt.badge.img+2
Abdul wrote:

Hi ​@Yoda Sebastian,

There is no such Planning Method available which specifically exclude On-Hand stock with MRP.

Alternative option is, create an Availability Control Id and set Part Supply Control option to Non Nettable

Link same Availability Control Id with your desired On-Hand stock before running MRP.

 

Regards

Abdul Rehman

Yes this i know, I have tried to Set Shelf life on the Semi Finished Goods to 0days , but then when warehouse want to use it they get a warning “issuing from expired quantity do yo want to continue?” so if i can get this warning away i can have the shelf life “0” and MRP will not calculate On hand


Abdul
Superhero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+12
  • Superhero (Partner)
  • December 10, 2024

Availability Control Id is better option to proceed with. I don't think other work around would work as efficiently like this 


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings