Skip to main content
Question

Intercompany order fulfillment with 100% customer-supplied (entrusted) raw material

  • August 6, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 36 views

Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi all,

I have a scenario I'd like advice on.

Site A is in Poland, Site B is in Bulgaria, each belonging to a different company. A customer order is registered at Site A, and I'd like this order to be fulfilled (produced) at Site B. However, 100% of the raw materials required to fulfill this order will be supplied/entrusted by Site A — Site B should never purchase this material; it must remain the property of Site A throughout production. Do you have any idea how to set this up in IFS Cloud?

1 reply

Piyal Perera
Hero (Employee)
Forum|alt.badge.img+12
  • Hero (Employee)
  • August 11, 2026

Hi ​@MALIPL 

I was also thinking outsourcing functionality for this issue. Cursor also suggested a detail plan. Please have a look.

 

Yes — this is toll / contract manufacturing with entrusted (customer-owned) materials, not a normal inter-site stock transfer. In IFS Cloud the pieces that fit are Part Ownership = Customer Owned at Site B, plus No Charge outsourcing (or an equivalent customer-owned shop-order flow) so Site B never takes ownership of the raw material.

Recommended pattern

Treat Site B as a manufacturing supplier to Site A, not as a sister warehouse buying the BOM.

End customer

↑ Customer Order (Site A)

Site A (PL, Co A) --PO for FG + No Charge components--> Site B (BG, Co B)

| |

owns RM Customer Owned stock

ships RM free of charge Shop Order (Customer Owned)

receives FG / pays only for service returns FG to A

1. Master data (cross-company)

  • Register Company A / Site A as a Customer of Company B (and Site B as a Supplier of Company A).
  • Link supplier ↔ customer (Supplier → Customer No).
  • On Site A: Purchase Component Method = Customer Order (needed for charge/no-charge components).
  • Parts exist on both sites; FG is a purchase part on A and a manufactured part on B.

2. Materials stay Site A’s property

Use outsourcing with No Charge components (Charge/No Charge in Outsourcing):

  • Site A raises a PO to Site B for the finished good.
  • Attach BOM components as No Charge (not charged to the supplier).
  • On release, IFS creates a customer order to ship those components from A → B.
  • Postings on A: issue to M15 WIP at supplier (not a sale of material).
  • Site B must not receive those parts as Company Owned inventory to buy/consume as its own stock.

At Site B, hold and consume them as Customer Owned, owner = Site A’s customer ID (Part Ownership):

  • Zero inventory value to Company B
  • No inventory valuation / purchase of that material
  • Shop order material lines and (usually) header = Customer Owned, same owning customer

3. Production at Site B

  • Shop order for the FG with Ownership = Customer Owned, Owner = Site A.
  • Issue only customer-owned stock belonging to that owner.
  • Receive FG as Customer Owned (still Site A’s property), then return/ship to Site A (or drop-ship if that is the commercial model).
  • Site B invoices manufacturing service only (labor/overhead), not the entrusted RM.

4. External customer order at Site A

  • Register the end-customer CO on Site A as usual.
  • Supply the FG from Site A after receipt from the outsourcing PO (or peg CO ↔ PO if you use that process).
  • Do not rely on standard Int Purch Trans / Distribution Order to move the raw materials as customer-owned stock — IFS does not support moving externally owned stock via inter-site CO/PO transit. Community guidance for customer-owned moves is Transport Task / Move Inventory Part, which is awkward across companies; outsourcing/no-charge is the designed cross-company path.

What to avoid

Approach Why it fails your rule

Inter-site PO/CO for RM (company-owned)

Transfers ownership / purchase into Site B

Consignment at B

Still supplier-owned stock intended to be purchased when used

Standard multi-site planning of customer-owned RM

Customer-owned is excluded from MRP

Practical caveats

  • Planning: customer-owned demand/supply is not MRP-planned — plan RM at A and capacity at B manually (or with separate processes).
  • Finance/tax: PL↔BG still needs correct Intrastat/customs docs and intercompany invoicing for the service; validate VAT with finance even on no-charge shipments.
  • Same owning customer on one shop order for all customer-owned lines.

Bottom line: Model Site B as an outsourced manufacturer. Site A ships RM No Charge, Site B tracks/produces under Customer Owned (owner = Site A), and Site A sells the FG to the end customer. That keeps legal ownership with Site A and stops Site B from purchasing the material.

If you share whether Site B should invoice only a service fee or a full FG price (ex-material), I can outline the exact order types and ownership settings line-by-line for that commercial model.

regards,

Piyal