Failure reporting navigator ISO 14224

Hi ​@KMortensen1976  - Could you kindly elaborate more on what is missing here?  

Hi sorry had to reset my password ;-)

the ISO 14224 is a multilevel reporting so when you have the main system and create a WO on this your first level of reporting you have the first level of subfunctions, when you select a sublevel you get the relevant choices for the subsystem. 

If you want to do this in IFS you can use the child itemclasses, but they can only be used for the main Itemclass of where they where created and thus not reused for other itemclasses and when using more functions your Symptom/cause selections are multiplied to a point where it is not usefull.

Hi all,

I also need to make the Failure Analysis Setup Navigator compliant with ISO 14224. Based on this standard, my current mapping proposal is as follows:

• Item classes (B.6 → B.14 – Equipment class code)
• Functions (nothing found)
• Fault types (nothing found)
• Symptoms (B.6 → B.14 – Failure modes)
• Causes (B.3 – Failure causes)
• Corrective actions (B.5 – Maintenance activity)
• Discovery code (B.4 – Detection method)

I couldn’t map the following items:

• B.1: Failure in relation to reliability and availability
• B.2: Failure mechanism

@KMortensen1976: Did you eventually succeed with your setup?

@Mayura Wasantha: Do you know if the Failure Analysis Setup Navigator was designed to comply with a specific standard?

Thanks both for your help.