Skip to main content
Solved

Not Consumed setting in combination with Master Scheduling is not recognized


Tharindu Illangasinghe
Superhero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+15

If a component i.e. “AG-TF-SUB-02“ is defined as “Not consumed“ in product structure and is driven by Master Scheduling and the assembly i.e “AG-TF-SUB-01“ which contain “AG-TF-SUB-02“ is driven by Master Scheduling it isn't recognized the  “Not Consumed“ Status of Component AG-TF-SUB-02 and demand for “Not Consumed“ Component Part was created.

 

Would like to know your opinion about this behavior. 

 

Product Structure AG-TF-SUB-1

 

 

Master Schedule AG-TF-SUB-1

This is correct

 

Master Schedule AG-TF-SUB-02

Is this the expected behavior ?

 

Subsequent MRP of Parts work as expected.

Best answer by Tharindu Illangasinghe

@dameenda  and @majose thank you both for your responses. I have raised a task to RnD now. 

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

4 replies

Tharindu Illangasinghe
Superhero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+15

This is seen in APPs10


Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Hero (Employee)
  • 208 replies
  • July 14, 2022

Hi Tharindu;

MRP seems working bit different to this, so please send a task to manufacturing for further investigation.


Forum|alt.badge.img+14
  • Hero (Employee)
  • 290 replies
  • July 15, 2022

Hi,

It seems like a strange scenario where an unconsumed component is Master Scheduled! When “doing Master  Scheduling” for sub assemblies and purchase parts it is typically for critical ones with long lead times, where you want to start procurement ahead of your actual demands.

But anyway, it smells like a bug.

Cheers,

Mats


Tharindu Illangasinghe
Superhero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+15

@dameenda  and @majose thank you both for your responses. I have raised a task to RnD now. 


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings