Skip to main content

Community,

May I know how to use below Additional Tab in window Engineering Part Revision?

 

Hi @ronhu 

As the name indicates this tab holds additional information about the part revision.

Section 1: During the design phase when the engineering revisions are not transferred to inventory, you can use this field to enter the estimated cost of materials work & hours for the manufacturing of the respective levels.

Once you transfer engineering revisions to inventory , then you can use the right mouse option Update Cost & Lead Time, then these values will be retrieved and updated from the inventory part costing

  • Lead Time (Part type in Inventory determines whether purchased or manufactured lead time is sent)
  • Standard Cost = Total Level Cost  (from Cost set 1 in Costing, or Estimated Cost in Inventory)
  • Material Cost = Level Material Cost + Level Delivery Overhead + Level Material Overhead   (from Cost set 1 in Costing, or Estimated Cost in Inventory)
  • Work Cost = Level Labor + Level Sub Contract + Level Overhead 1 + Level Overhead 2   (from Cost set 1)
  • Last purchase price = Total Standard (from Cost set 3)
  • Average purchase price = Total Standard (from Cost set 4)

Section 2: These are the calculated values, and the calculation can be perform using the right mouse option Calculate Cost and the costs are calculated and updated as follows.

  • Calc Cost = Sum of (Calc Cost for the child * Quantity for the child) for all children on this level  + the part revisions own material cost.
  • Calc Work = Sum of (Calc Work for the child * Quantity for the child) for all children on this level + the part revisions own work cost..
  • Calc Hour = Sum of (Calc Hour for the child * Quantity for the child) for all children on this level + the part revisions own hours.

 

Section 3: This is a filed where you can mention the rough estimated cost of the parts including materials, work and any other overheads and this is used only for information purposes.

 

Hope this helps!!

Regards,

Mithun K V


@EqeMithuV  Appreciated.


Reply