Skip to main content
Question

How do I get routings to of sub-assemblies to be linked to the top level assembly

  • February 6, 2026
  • 1 reply
  • 19 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Do Gooder (Customer)

I have several top level assemblies that consist of a few sub-assemblies. I am getting the components of each sub-asseb,ly when I print the Work Instructions but I am not getting the routing for them. Is there a way that I can :

A: Have the routings for each sub-assembly show with the top level shop order. or

B: Have the system link all the routings together 9Meybe with the sequesce?

1 reply

SNIRLK
Hero (Employee)
Forum|alt.badge.img+9
  • Hero (Employee)
  • February 9, 2026

Hi ​@AMP,

What you are seeing is standard behavior in IFS and IFS does not automatically roll up sub‑assembly routings into a top‑level shop order.

 

In IFS Manufacturing:

  • Components of sub‑assemblies do roll up to the top‑level shop order (via the product structure)
  • Routings do NOT roll up
    Routings are tied to the produced part of a shop order, not to the structure hierarchy

So when you print Work Instructions for a top‑level shop order:

  • ✅ You get components from all sub‑assemblies
  • ❌ You only get operations from the routing of the top‑level part

 

Further IFS cannot sequence or merge routings across parts automatically.

Sequencing (Operation No, Parallel, Sequence) only works:

  • Within one routing
  • Within one shop order

There is no standard function to:

  • Link routing of Sub‑Assembly A
    → into routing of Top‑Assembly B
    → via sequence or operation dependency

 

Why IFS does not do this automatically (design reason)

IFS must preserve:

  • Revision integrity
  • Part‑specific operation history
  • Accurate costing
  • Independent scheduling

Merging routings across parts would:

  • Break revision control
  • Mix execution history
  • Corrupt costing & lead time calculations

This is why IFS keeps structure and routing execution separate by design.

 

Hope this helps. Let me know your feedback.

Thanks & Regards,

SN