+14Hi,
This question is related to an APPS 10 UPD10 environment and for SEPA format file.
Let’s say you have 3 expense sheets for the same employee.
You authorize the 3 expense sheets and transfer them for payment.
The created file will have 3 bank transfers, one for each expense sheet.
We would like to have only 1 bank transfer, grouping the 3 amounts.
Is that possible in some way ?
Thanks !
Best answer by JONEDE
We did it with two customized RMB-Options.
First, we took all payments for the employee that are authorized and we made one advanced payment with the total sum.
Then this payment has been transferred as normal.
After this with a second customized RMB-Option the payment has been devided to the single expense sheets with correct amount to have a zero balance.
Afterwards you made the normal payment in full.
If you keep the correct order it works good.
+7Hello
As far as I know that is not possible.
Please raise a case to IFS Support so we can direct this to R&D.
Thank you,
Dhananga
Hi
At Group header level , Tag <CtrlSum>XXX</CtrlSum> is there with cumulative employment payment, does it not fulfill your business requirement?
+14Thank you for your comment.
I did the test with payments for several employees and the Tag <CtrlSum>XXX</CtrlSum> is presenting the total sum of the payments transferred in the file.
It is not a total per employee.
So that does not meet the business requirement.
Best regards
Lénaïc
+3Hello
Did you get some Feedback from the RnD? We, like a customer, are also quite interested in the topic.
Thank you in advance!
Best Regards,
Plamen Savov
+14Hi
The case is opened and still under investigation at the moment.
I will add the output here when I get it.
Best regards
Lénaïc
+3Hello again
Is there something new on the topic? Is there something what we, like a customer, can do to emphasize to the RnD that it is an important feature for us?
Best Regards,
Plamen
+7We did it with two customized RMB-Options.
First, we took all payments for the employee that are authorized and we made one advanced payment with the total sum.
Then this payment has been transferred as normal.
After this with a second customized RMB-Option the payment has been devided to the single expense sheets with correct amount to have a zero balance.
Afterwards you made the normal payment in full.
If you keep the correct order it works good.
+3It is pity that for something so common and logical, we have to do own customizing.
+1Where is the problem with multiple payments? It’s more easy to control the payments for each expense by the employees then.
+3The problem is that in some countries where we operate with IFS, there is a bank fee on every SEPA transaction.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
