+18Has anyone successfully implemented IFS Applications 10 to use the default SSL port 443 instead of the standard port numbers?
One of my client wants to implement this configuration for couple of reasons:
Please advise, thanks!
Best answer by dsj
Hi
Given below is example configuration.
Loadbalancer is of type TCP with listener port 443
Regards,
Damith
+22Hi
It worked straight for us.
In our installations we use SSL passthrough where external load balancer setup to pass through traffic to IFS and the SSL certificate is managed in IFS. But I hope other options also work as they should.
Regards,
Damith
+18Hi
Can you please provide more details or a screenshot of your configuration?
We are using SSL Passthrough right now and it works fine as long as the port number 48080 is part of the SSL proxy URL.
Example - https://ifs.mydomain.com:48080
However the goal is to utilize the standard SSL Port - 443.
Example - https://ifs.mydomain.com
+22Hi
Given below is example configuration.
Loadbalancer is of type TCP with listener port 443
Regards,
Damith
+18I did not specify the port number 443 in the Proxy URL assuming https would resolve to the default port number. Adding the port number at the end made the configuration to work and another colleague of mine confirmed this as well.
Thank you!
+10Yes, I have used 443 default SSL port and reconfigured MWS. that way you can use the url without 48080 as well.
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
