Skip to main content
Solved

GL Automatic Posting Rules: Code Part Value After Posting


Forum|alt.badge.img+2

Hello there,

We are using IFS Cloud. I am trying to use GL Automatic Posting Rules to post certain revenues (original GL coding will come in via manual customer invoice; voucher F) into other accounts based on a certain percentage.  I have set up the "original code string" tab as below. I have allowed the project code part to be "%" to allow any value. 

When setting up on "Automatic Posting Rows" tab, the below error message popped up. The project code part is not the budget/planning code part and it is in the valid time interval. 

In this scenario, my intention is to retain the same project code part value from the original posting. The project code part value may vary in the original posting, which makes it impossible for me to set it to a specific value.

Can you please help? I would greatly appreciate any insights or guidance you could provide on this. Thank you!

 

Best answer by Furkan Zengin

Hi @itsrubym 

Use asterisk ( * ) on Automatic Posting Rows tab for Project code part. 

See example below

 

 

Hope this helps

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

6 replies

Furkan Zengin
Superhero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+21
  • Superhero (Partner)
  • 697 replies
  • Answer
  • May 26, 2023

Hi @itsrubym 

Use asterisk ( * ) on Automatic Posting Rows tab for Project code part. 

See example below

 

 

Hope this helps


Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Author
  • Do Gooder (Customer)
  • 6 replies
  • May 26, 2023

@gumabs Thank you!! It worked


Furkan Zengin
Superhero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+21
  • Superhero (Partner)
  • 697 replies
  • May 27, 2023

@itsrubym I am glad that your issue is resolved. Mark my message as answer so that other community members can get benefit from solution

Thanks


audreyS
Sidekick (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+9
  • Sidekick (Partner)
  • 83 replies
  • April 8, 2025

Hi ​@Furkan Zengin 

We have a problem with our rules for M1 and M40. We did UNISS - Undo Issue for Shop Order and it generated an M8 (if I understand correctly, it's a revaluation that had to be done on a purchased item that I have in the structure of my item).

But it took the text of the M1, so it triggered an excess auto settlement, so my 999999 account isn't at 0.

Have you ever encountered this problem?

 

 

 

 

 

thank you for your help


Furkan Zengin
Superhero (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+21
  • Superhero (Partner)
  • 697 replies
  • April 11, 2025

Hello ​@audreyS 

I dont see any problem. You have setup a rule for for combination of accounting 355000000+transaction code M1+Text Annuler sortie ….

The combination is generated and the rule is applied. You have triggered your rule from M1 not from M40.

So maybe change your rule from M1 to M40 so it will only create when the combination of account+transaction coede+text generated.

Thanks

Furkan


audreyS
Sidekick (Partner)
Forum|alt.badge.img+9
  • Sidekick (Partner)
  • 83 replies
  • April 15, 2025

 

Hi ​@Furkan Zengin 

My problem is that the M8 takes the same transaction code and therefore the same text and generates an APR whereas I don't want an apr on the M8 just on the M1 and M40.

the M8 is already on a 713 account we don't need an auto ruler

there's the same problem with the M9, it takes the same text 

 

I don't know what to do other than perform a manual operation or create an auto rule to cancel this movement. I don't find that satisfactory.


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings