Skip to main content

Hi,

I’m having an issue with syncing the task attachments to the mobile in FSM Development environment. 

The task_attachment sync rule is exactly the same in dev and test environments and this is working fine in test environment.

I have tried reinstalling the app but it didn’t work. Please not that updating the task or reinitialising the device synced the documents in, as the related query of task sync rule is also pointing at the task attachments. But I need the real time syncing in task_attachments. 

Appreciate your help on this.

Kind regards,

Anupama Nagahawatta

Hey @AnupamaHN 

Can you share with us the sync rules?

  • TASK_ATTACHMENT
  • ATTACHMENT

Cheers!

Hi @Shneor Cheshin 

Thanks for reaching out to me. Please find the sync rules attached bellow.

  1. ATTACHMENT:

Ownership query:

<hierarchy_select>
 <primary_table>task_assignment_view</primary_table>
 <from>
  <table>task_assignment_view</table>
  <table>task_attachment</table>
  <table>attachment</table>
 </from>
 <attrs>
  <attr>task_assignment_view.person_id</attr>
 </attrs>
 <where>
  <data_constraint>
   <constraint>
    <left_operand>attachment.attachment_id</left_operand>
    <operator>eq</operator>
    <right_operand>{ATTACHMENT_ID}</right_operand>
   </constraint>
  </data_constraint>
  <join_constraint>
    <constraint>
    <left_operand>task_assignment_view.task_id</left_operand>
    <operator>equi</operator>
    <right_operand>task_attachment.task_id</right_operand>
    </constraint>
    <constraint>
    <left_operand>task_attachment.attachment_id</left_operand>
    <operator>equi</operator>
    <right_operand>attachment.attachment_id</right_operand>
    </constraint>
  </join_constraint>
 </where>
</hierarchy_select>

 

  1. TASK_ATTACHMENT:

Ownership query:

<hierarchy_select return_only_requested_attrs="true" max_rows='50000'>
 <primary_table>task_assignment_view</primary_table>
 <from>
  <table>task_assignment_view</table>
 </from>
 <attrs>
  <attr>task_assignment_view.person_id</attr>
 </attrs>
 <where>
  <data_constraint>
   <constraint>
    <left_operand>task_assignment_view.task_id</left_operand>
    <operator>eq</operator>
    <right_operand>{task_id}</right_operand>
   </constraint>
  </data_constraint>
 </where>
</hierarchy_select>

 

Related Query:

<hierarchy_select return_only_requested_attrs="true" max_rows="50000">
      <primary_table>task_attachment</primary_table>
      <attrs>
        <attr>task_attachment.*</attr>
        <attr>attachment.*</attr>
      </attrs>
      <from>
        <table>task_attachment</table>
        <table>attachment</table>
      </from>
      <where>
     <data_constraint>
       <constraint>
        <left_operand>TASK_ATTACHMENT.TASK_ID</left_operand>
         <operator>eq</operator>
        <right_operand>{TASK_ID}</right_operand>
        </constraint>
       <constraint>
        <left_operand>TASK_ATTACHMENT.ATTACHMENT_ID</left_operand>
         <operator>eq</operator>
        <right_operand>{ATTACHMENT_ID}</right_operand>
        </constraint>
        </data_constraint>
        <join_constraint>
          <constraint>
            <left_operand>task_attachment.attachment_id</left_operand>
            <operator>left_outer</operator>
            <right_operand>attachment.attachment_id</right_operand>
          </constraint>
        </join_constraint>
      </where>
    </hierarchy_select>

 

Regards,

Anupama Nagahawatta

 

 

 

Hey @AnupamaHN 

I can’t see anything wrong with the sync rule.

Need to continue and investigate.

Do you see the attachment when you query the mobile DB?

Do you see it get into FSM DB table mm_message_out?

Cheers!

Hi @Shneor Cheshin 

I see the attachment when I query for the ATTCHMENT table in the mobile but not when I query for TASK_ATTACHMENT.

Yes, I could see it in mm_message_out from the server end and got cleared out (assumed becuase it got synced successfully) didn’t see it in mm_message_in in the mobile

 

Cheers

@AnupamaHN 

This is a tough one.

Maybe you overwrite the task - task_attachment relation def in custom metadata?

Sorry mate, I am out of ideas…

Cheers!

Reply


Terms & ConditionsCookie settings