Solved

Can we write a condition using expression instead of using "change" operator

4 years ago
June 9, 2020
1 reply
151 views

+8

TDCMANIRUL
Do Gooder (Customer)
20 replies

Can we write a condition using expression instead of using "change" operator. I have a business rule where I have a condition using expression like below:

In the same expression can we also check whether PERSON_CAL_EXCEPT.START_DTTM has been changed or not. The intention is not to add one more input param “PERSON_CAL_EXCEPT.START_DTTM” and not to rebuild the condition again with an additional line for checking whether PERSON_CAL_EXCEPT.START_DTTM has been changed or not.

Please help if anybody has any suggestion on this.

Best answer by Lee Pinchbeck

Hi,

How I have seen this sort of thing handled before is to have a separate rule to check the old and new values for a field and to update a field (usually an unused user_def field) or create an event when the new is different to old.

You can then set the business rule to check if this value or event is present and, if it is, action the rule.

Hope this helps,

Lee Pinchbeck

View original

Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

+24

Lee Pinchbeck
Ultimate Hero
1219 replies
Answer
4 years ago
June 16, 2020

Hi,

How I have seen this sort of thing handled before is to have a separate rule to check the old and new values for a field and to update a field (usually an unused user_def field) or create an event when the new is different to old.

You can then set the business rule to check if this value or event is present and, if it is, action the rule.

Hope this helps,

Lee Pinchbeck

Currently reading: The Way of Kings - Brandon Sanderson

Can we write a condition using expression instead of using "change" operator

1 reply

Reply

Cookie policy

Cookie settings

Reply

Did you find what you're looking for? If not:

Sign up

Login to the community

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded

Cookie policy

Cookie settings