DMM - Post Deployment Tentative to Buildable (Routing/Product Structure)

Hi, 

On the above scenario, are you running the post deployment when you deploy data in deployment container?

I’m using the Post Deploy button on a per row basis, but yes.  It isn’t changing the Deploy Status like other Post Deploys Ive done so I feel like its not triggering the criteria at all.

Please check whether the OBJID is holding correct value and passing to the Build__ function. You need to give DO as action and don’t need to give any value for attr_.

Hi

I am having the same problem.
Has anyone else had this problem solved?

I could never get it to work.

I ended up just creating python scripts to run the build APIs for routings and product structures after the migrations finished.

Hi @dustin_arp

Thank you for your reply.

I see that the current functionality cannot handle this.
We will wait for a functional update...

Hi,

I share this information in case someone else has the same problem in the future.
I was able to update the status with the following settings.

(Sequence 4 is not required if set up in advance.)

Hi ​@ERSA!

Just stumble into this post now, I’m curious why do you use the DECODE Method in SHOP_ORD_CODE_API if this is a Structure status update?

I’m trying to follow your directions to do the same (change structures from “Tentative” into “Buildable”) but I don’t have any SHOP_ORD_CODE_API methods available in my method list.

Can you please remove the Apostrophs for the ACTION- parameter? Instead of 'DO' use DO.

​@Jens and ​@ERSA 

I managed to progress on this. I now know that you can call any API you want as part of the Post Deployment Process, so using the SHOP_ORD_CODE_API is perfectly fine. 

The problem now is that I’m not getting the right OBJVERSION. When I try to deploy this is what I see: “Error in Additional deployment process : ORA-20115: ProdStructAlternate.The "Prod Struct Alternate" has already been removed by another user.”

It is as if the PROD_STRUCT_ALTERNATE_API.GET_ID_VERSION_BY_KEYS is not obtaining the right OBJVERSION for me.

I even configured the params like this…notice I even forced “Manufacturing” in BOM_TYPE_ to make sure the translation from DB to NON_DB values will not be an issue (all my parts are of BOM_TYPE_DB = “M” so I can use a Default here)

Anything obvious is wrong here?

​@msurasky-price 

There doesn't seem to be a problem.
I'm sorry I can't help you.

Eri