Any customers using CAMRO?

@david.harmer I’ve implemented the solution at Revima before joining the presales organization. The main difference with your solution is CAMRO module relies on the VIM module (Vehicle Information Management) to run, which offers you three possibilities :

• Configuration control along the shop visit execution
• LLP definition and tracking with pro-rata calculations
• Modification management
• What needs to be precised is that the configuration templates you’ve defined will enforce the sequence to disassemble and reassemble the engine. You must know the product structures in Manufacturing module. It means disassembly and assembly product structures are built by the system when we transfer the configuration templates from VIM to manufacturing

Of course, building the configuration templates and the rest is an overhead, but add value to the solution.

But in general, the CAMRO flow is really designed for what it is, benefiting about the workscoping tool, service contracts with dedicated invoicing settings… ANd because it is tailored to repair complex assemblies, everything which is done for our customers in older version Applications 10 and are about to be added in the core product in IFS Cloud in the next releases will be developped in CAMRO for sure (invoicing, tear down shop visit, on-condition workscope for sub-assemblies, variable workscope for piece parts,...).