I’m attempting to implement routings using the new (to apps10) feature of resource share per the below; every example given shows less than a full loading though. I’m trying to understand the expected behavior when loading requires more than one “cycle” i.e. if the below example was for 14 units instead of 4. I would expect one run at 100% and one at 40% per the slide below, but it doesn’t seem to be happening this way.
![](https://uploads-eu-west-1.insided.com/ifs-en/attachment/cec0757f-ef13-4844-ae23-9c81fc76e9d9.png)
In my test case, I have an operation line with a resource share of .5 and a lot size of 3 on the shop order. When I release this, I get the below information message about calculated resource share (which gets fixed at 1, and that makes sense)
![](https://uploads-eu-west-1.insided.com/ifs-en/attachment/a37b08b1-e995-4c99-964c-ec34882612d5.png)
![](https://uploads-eu-west-1.insided.com/ifs-en/attachment/371b4db7-aae4-47a6-a807-54e084951830.png)
However, contrary to expectations, the actual result is different, instead of 2 cycles as expected (first cycle 100% utilization, second cycle 50% utilization) it clocks one cycle at more capacity than is possible.
Is this a setting that isn’t correctly set in our environment? or something else?
![](https://uploads-eu-west-1.insided.com/ifs-en/attachment/a37b08b1-e995-4c99-964c-ec34882612d5.png)
![](https://uploads-eu-west-1.insided.com/ifs-en/attachment/f8f3a493-4080-4a86-9956-b0ba5aa4ae65.png)
Best answer by Björn Hultgren
View original