Skip to main content
Solved

Parts with Planning method K appears in IPAP

  • March 16, 2021
  • 3 replies
  • 293 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Sidekick (Customer)
  • 12 replies

Hi,

We are using planning method K (Blow through planning) frequently,  Sometimes the demand of the K-planned parts appears in Inventory Part Availability planning, producing alarms that we have a “Negative Projected Onhand”.

 

Anyone who knows why?

Best answer by ShawnBerk

Since you can trace the reasons the item appear in IPAP to two specific scenarios where the demand is coming from a known source, but the supply is from an unusual source, then yes, I think you could be safe in ignoring the Exception message in these two circumstances.  It is good to have the investigation and understanding though.

This topic has been closed for replies.

3 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+28
  • Superhero (Customer)
  • 1482 replies
  • March 17, 2021

How do you have demand for a Planning Method K part?  It must be appearing on an order or requisition somewhere, yes?  Is it possible that someone is changing the planning method temporarily to something else to fulfill or create a shop order, but forgetting to change it back before MRP runs?  The only way to tell this for sure would be to enable the history log on the Inventory Part > Planning Method.


Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Author
  • Sidekick (Customer)
  • 12 replies
  • March 19, 2021

Hi,

Thank you for your answer, I am sure that the planning method on the inventory part has not been changed, but can it be overriden somehow?

 

When investigating further I found two scenarios.

The first is when the K-planned part is needed by a P-planned part that at the occation has 1 pcs in stock. all demands for the P-planned part is then shown in IPAP and broken down to the K-planned part and it’s components. On the P and K-planned levels, no supplies are shown. 

 

The second scenario is when the K-planned part is included in a product structure for a part that is DOP-controlled. Also here demand seems to be correct on the component level.

 

Since demand is correct on components in both scenarios I am considering just to ignore the Exception messages. Do you think that would be a risk?

 


Forum|alt.badge.img+28
  • Superhero (Customer)
  • 1482 replies
  • Answer
  • March 19, 2021

Since you can trace the reasons the item appear in IPAP to two specific scenarios where the demand is coming from a known source, but the supply is from an unusual source, then yes, I think you could be safe in ignoring the Exception message in these two circumstances.  It is good to have the investigation and understanding though.