Skip to main content
Question

Customer Component Repair - Shop Order or Work Order with/without CRO

  • January 16, 2026
  • 2 replies
  • 39 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+16

Community,

Wondering what is the best option for customer component repair, Work order or Shop Order?

We are using APP10, Products are manufactured in house and ship to customer. If customer had issues with the product, it will be transport back to our shop floor.

Question: 

  1. will CRO applied to our scenario?
  2. Repair shop order or Work Order, which one is better? we do have both 2 modules installed.
  3. if no CRO, which is the best option to bring the customer products back to our site with customer owned ownership?

Thank you.

2 replies

SNIRLK
Hero (Employee)
Forum|alt.badge.img+8
  • Hero (Employee)
  • January 19, 2026

Hi ​@ronhu,

✅ Best option for customer component repair in APP10: CRO + Repair Shop Order.

Component Repair Order (CRO) is specifically designed for scenarios where:

  • A product manufactured in‑house is shipped to a customer
  • The customer returns the defective/failed item
  • The repair happens in your own shop floor
  • The item must retain customer-owned ownership

 

🛠 Shop Order vs Work Order — Which to use?

1️⃣ Repair Shop Order (via CRO) — recommended

Your internal APP10 examples show that CRO creates and manages a Repair Shop Order, which is part of the Component MRO process.
Example: A CRO with Repair Order Type = “Repair Shop Order” and customer ownership in the APP10 environment.
[APP10 | OneNote]

Support documents show that CRO automatically:

  • Creates a Customer Order for the return shipment and billing
  • Maintains ownership as Customer Owned

Uses Shop Orders for disassembly, internal repair, or external repair.

 

2️⃣ Work Orders

Work Orders in APP10 are positioned under Service & Maintenance (SM/EAM), not MRO.
They are typically used for:

  • Internal maintenance
  • Equipment/asset servicing
  • Preventive maintenance scheduling

➡️ Work Orders are generally not appropriate when dealing with customer-owned parts returning for repair.

 

🎯 Summary

Option

Use Case

Recommended?

Why

CRO + Repair Shop Order

Customer-owned item returned for repair

Yes — Best Practice

Fully supports MRO return, ownership, repair routing, pricing, integrated CO

Work Order

Internal maintenance / asset service

❌ Not recommended

Not designed for customer-owned repair flows

Standalone Shop Order (no CRO)

Basic manufacturing repair without customer flow

⚠️ Possible but not ideal

Missing customer ownership, CO linkage, billing integration

 

For further reference;

ifs.sharepoint.com/teams/PresalesStandardContent/Shared Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?id=%2Fteams%2FPresalesStandardContent%2FShared Documents%2F04_Products%2F01_IFS Cloud%2F02_Functional Modules%2FMRO %26 Fleet Operations%2FComponent MRO%2FDocuments%2FIFS Cloud - Component Repair Order%2Epdf&parent=%2Fteams%2FPresalesStandardContent%2FShared Documents%2F04_Products%2F01_IFS Cloud%2F02_Functional Modules%2FMRO %26 Fleet Operations%2FComponent MRO%2FDocuments

 

 

Hope this clarifies your concern. Let me know the feedback.

Thanks & Regards,

SN


Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Hero (Employee)
  • January 19, 2026

if no CRO, which is the best option to bring the customer products back to our site with customer owned ownership?

Have you tried RMA (Return Material Authorization)?