Hi,This is my case and thanks for the investigation.We have strong recommendation from our auditors to track logins with account IFSADMIN, is there any other way of doing this?/Anna
Hi, We are testing and are experiencing exactely the same issue. We are on IFS10 upd14.When doing manual move inventory part system will not allow the move. When putaway function is used the transport task is create but cannot be executed since no capacity.Does anybody know how this should work, are we missing some parameter ? /Anna
Hi,This is the window we like them to have access to, this overview show the employees clocked in so present at work. It’s used for emergency situations.My problem is that I cannot find any access attribute related to this window. /Anna
Hi, Thanks for your answer, here are some more details.There are few employees responsible for occupational health and safety and the requirement is that they need access to see all employees in the overview Present employees. In self service HR windows they should only have access to own data.I know how to grant them access to the present employees window but HR access is needed on top of this and setting them up in supervisor access with position that got access to all employees I can achive this. Tricky part is that it’s only in this window we would like them to see all employees and not in others. /Anna
Hi,We have addressed the same issue to IFS, it was found during upgrade project to IFS 10 upd14. We have this issue when structure revision is put to obsolete from the overview Structure alternatesReply from IFS This is standard behavior of the IFS application. The product status column only shows the status of the product, either In Effect or Not in Effect. It does not reflect that the revision is obsolete. This seems to be a limitation of the current IFS application version.There is idea for this on community that is considered for future development
Hi,Thanks Mats for your reply. Did some testing today based on the info you provided. Found that the error comes from time phased safety stocks where To dates where setup outside of the calendar. When adjusting these to be within the generated calendar the error no longer occured. Already have a case with support on this so I will provide them with the details so hopefully we can get a better message in the mrp log.Regards,Anna
Hi, Thanks for quick reply, have reported to support to get this fix.Do you know if there is some workaround available?We have MS setup to create so req’s for entier horizon, just tested to change it to create so req with planning time fench for 10 days defined but then I got the same errormessage. When creating manually a shoporder req I do not get this errormessage./Anna
Hi, We restarted our MWS’s and seems issue went away, at least for now./Anna
They get it as soon as they start IFS just opening various windows or running some IFS standard reports. It has worked fine before for these users but these errors started to occur yesterday. Have not heared that there where issues with any quick reports or attachements.
Thanks for your answers.We managed to work around the issue by changing the site default manufacturing calender to once that was in generated status. When calender was no longer the default calendar we could generate it without any problem. Changing it back to be the default calendar also worked without any issue. /Anna
I have other simlar questions, hope you can help outThe time clock objects NEWZPOS2 and NEWZPOS3 does not trigger the employee to swipe the card eventhough we have set them to card driven. The time clock object IN ABSENCE, when setting this to card driven there is no option to choose the wage code but absence is created with wage code *, the dialogue for wage code is not appearing. Are these related to some settings or are they bugs?We are on IFS 10 upd 3 Regards,Anna
This is exactely our issue so we will take this further reporting a case to IFS support to see if we can get this delivered to us as a single patch.Thanks for you help /Anna
Made some more tests but even when printing to logical printer as found in on the articles it does not work.With the report rule to check in to docman active I get no printout to printer even when selecting and printing to physical printer. In print manager the print flag is not checked.Could this be a bugg? /Anna
Hi, For order confirmation we have report rule set to set specific layout and to insert additional PDF.For invoices we have also report rule in place but only to set specific layoutChecked our system parameters and we do not have the PDF/A compliant set Regards,Anna
Hi, I have setup a report rule similar to yours but does not get anything created in docman.Is there something more needed for this, some background job or other?I have report rule to on customer order confirmation that I would like to have checked in to docmanWe run IFS 10 update 3 Regards,Anna
Thanks for your quick help on thisWe have both parked supplier and customer payment. We cleared both of those out and then we where able to run the currency revaluation. Regards,Anna
Thanks for all your quick replies :-)Changing user group does not make any difference, the user is connected to proper users groups.When I query these vouchers in voucher_tab I see that they have status Waiting so this is why they do not appear in approve voucher windows.As I understand the MPL vouchers are normally approved automatically but for some reason this is not hte case for these vouchers.Is there any way to get these vouchers to approved except from the approve voucher window where we cannot get them displayed?Or do we need to get help from IFS to do a data repair on them setting them to approved?/Anna
The checkbox No Multi solved my issue:-)Thanks for your quick help!/Anna
Hi,We had a font substitution in place for English, not sure why.When I remove this oen in TEST I get same line spacing in all languages.Thanks for your quick on this:-)Regards, Anna
Hi,We have the same issue, in many cases the contact mail address for order confirmation is different then contact mail address for invoice.Interested to follow if you get an answer to your question. /Anna
Hi, Thanks for the information, very helpful.Looking further on this I found that to have data here you need to enable the option ‘Generate Trace Information’ on the payment method. /Anna
Thanks for your help on this.My issue turned out to be the BASE_ITEM_NO in CHARATER_LINES this needs to be our part no and i had customer’s part no in there.Found that system does not seem to bother about value in CONFIGURATION_ID but it used characteristic id and values Now it works fine, when order is created system automatically adds the proper configuration.
Thanks for your reply, I will create cast to IFS support
Hi and thanks for the reply.We have some skilled super users that create migration jobs on their own. In that process it’s good to be able to query the loaded data, sometimes by joining standard views to verify and validate the migration job.We know that if user have IFS_ALL permissionset granted it is possible to query migation tables also with other users but we have not been able to figure out what grant is giving this access.
Hi Mats,Thanks for your answer. We run the jobs in sequence, all planning jobs run in one queue with only one process. Do you mean setting the queue to run with 2 processes so we there can be 2 MS’s running in parallell?We run on IFS 10 upd 3 and not sure G1975814-A is part of that, we have not had any CRP related patch installed, will ask support for that patch./Anna
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
