Following this thread as we're interested as well.
Hi,I had the same issue, found this thread, and used the following solution:In 23R1 U6 you can set the Editable column value from “None” value to “Target” in Object Connection Transformations. Then it will work (in my case).Cheers,Stephan
Hi @Tomas Ruderfelt ,Our business flow is indeed with the mobile, I'll align with the system engineer to get the latest SU. Thanks for your swift reply.Cheers,Stephan
Hi @Uthpala, We have the same issue as reported by @ZEPWAYNEH , using: 23R1, in more details:IFS Cloud Web version: 23.1.3.20230705170642.0IFS OData provider version: 23.1.3.20230705171938.0 Should we create a case for this or is this Community post sufficient? Kind regards,Stephan
Have you used the structure described here: https://docs.ifs.com/techdocs/23r1/040_tailoring/225_configuration/260_context_based_configuration/#conceptual_example You can also exclude your specific user from the group with != operator.
Hi @Shirley Alemao ,Have you got your answer possible offline this community already? Would you be able to share the info?Cheers,Stephan
Hi @drooij ,If you sent the tasks to all devices (so no user means it's sent to everyone right?), be aware of performance!On the other hand, if you made customization's, are those server side or mobile side? If those are mobile side it's hard to find an answer here as we can't look into the changes you did in the code.If you just want to perform “any” action I would recommend not to use the baseline DebriefOverview for such a situation, but create you own screen where you perform that action. In that way you have full control instead of have to figure out the DebriefOverview features/behaviour, as that's a partly hard coded screen to my knowledge.Cheers,Stephan
Hi @CHJYLK ,I found the document here, thanks.Cheers,Stephan
IFS R&D found a bug, the reported it should be fixed in SU4 but in SU5 it still exists. Keep you updated here.
IFS Cloud 21R1 onwards, production organization approvals can be setup and CRS can be printed for manufactured parts. I can't find any information or documents regarding how to set up POA, can you @CHJYLK point me to more details on this? Thanks in advance, Stephan.
Hi Laura,Check the "Enterprise Identities Series” for this.
@Nikita38 ,From the case we have running for this, solution by my colleague Michael. The error occurred when the data was deployed using the deployment container. After some small investigation I noticed that the error ON_NEW was caused by a value that was fetched from the target table definition, and specifically from both the “Insertable” and “Updatable” columns.In the table that stores the target table definition I found out there was no values for both these columns for the “Country” and “Default language”. So even though the client displays for both the columns the value “Yes”, in the table is was simply NULL. So when deploying the value NULL was fetched for the ON_NEW during the deployment and that simply causes a validation error in the procedure, hence the error message.Unfortunately the columns for “Insertable” and “Updatable” are not editable so there is no standard functionality to change these values. That is why in the target table definition page designer I made both fiel
Thanks for the reply, no success yet with the suggested option @Jens, trying to get a meeting with Salwa for a remote session. Will keep this thread updated with any outcome.
After discussion with IFS I learned that our request is not possible. Solution to be used is to use the ‘old id's’ from the legacy system and map them via a conversion list. For the number of customers in our project this is not a problem at all.The Smart Data Manager isn't just a one-time migration tool, it's a data tool for the whole project. Therefore you need to know which records from the source are which records in the deployment, this is by key.This thread can be closed in my opinion.
No, the parent-child connection in the screen above has nothing to do with automatic mapping. But to be honest it’s worth to think about this idea. But then this automatic mapping might be only available within one migration object. I’ll discuss this idea with the responsible persons in this area at IFS. But have you ever tried the Smart Mapping functionality in the mapping screen ofs IFS SDM? This functionality can reduce time to do the mapping. Hi @Jens,Thanks for your input! But it's not about automatic mapping. Indeed the Smart Mapping feature helps out with the work on that one for sure ^^But simply said, if we want to migrate in 1 Migration Object both customer_info and customer_info_address (we're using the template provided by IFS). Is it possible to populate both the customer_id by IFS automatically, thus:CUSTOMER_INFO.CUSTOMER_ID (this works already, it's populated on INSERT) CUSTOMER_INFO_ADDRESS.CUSTOMER_ID (should be the same id as above, but I can't get it to work yet)
In 22R1 we have the same result, no success on parent-child relations there either.Is there any example, demo environment where we can check this functionality?
Hi @Thomas Widmoser ,I think this should be possible (haven't tested myself yet), but if I read Mike his statements it is possible with wildcard substituation variables.As you want to sent out 1 notification to n resources, right?Quote by Mike:"...and/or you would use a distribution entry with a wildcard variable that resolves to a set of addresses (i.e. retrieves multiple PERSON records). For the wildcard substitution variable, if more than one record qualifies in the final mapping, FSM will use all of them.” https://community.ifs.com/field-service-management-fsm-planning-and-scheduling-optimization-pso-249/fsm-notifications-1483https://community.ifs.com/field-service-management-fsm-planning-and-scheduling-optimization-pso-249/fsm-notifications-4834
Hi @Bhanuka Senevirathne ,If you don't use ARP, this information is sent over via every LOAD file, so if you update the information in FSM, with the next LOAD file (usually overnight) the information will be available in PSO.If you do use ARP, the behavior is according to Lee his post. You would be able to utilize the RESTful gateway to update this kind of information possibly in PSO? This minimizes the manual work in updating mass values, but you need some kind of process/tool to send the updates.
As Brian said, via Client Scripting you would be able to hide the buttons, as can be seen in: <your server>/Help/FSMReferenceGuide/AboutClientScriptMobileSmartClient.htmlSearch for “BUTTON_ADD”.
It is integrated with FSM. I have checked that the ThreesixtyDataset_ID are all active, and in the Scheduling app params that Threesixty_enabled is marked as “Y”. Any idea where else I could check, or what might have caused it? Hi @HannMat,Is this issue solved by now? What you might check are the scheduled processes on LOAD and CHANGE files. If they did not existed, and no change was sent from FSM to PSO, it takes to long and the PSO will set the dataset to inactive.Cheers,Stephan
You would be able to create a client script that jumps to that particular survey group screen in the mobile on status xyz (assuming you are working on the mobile device).With this you can trigger that survey on status “on site”, on refresh screen script or a custom button for example.Cheers,Stephan
Hi @RAQVVAIDYA ,Wouldn't you be able to solve this via a config? By scanning the QR and retrieving stored information like Serial. Based on that Serial you'd do a query in your database and fetch the rest of the values and create usages in that script as well if you would want that.Cheers,Stephan
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
