Just to mention , “Finalize Supplier Shipment Automatically” field in Site will only applicable to deliver supplier shipment automatically for return rental . I created a supplier return from a rental purchase order (inter-company rental). The supplier shipment is created, but not finalized automatically although the setting on site level says it should. I assume it should automatically finalize, right? Or is my expectation wrong? Hi,How does your shipment type setup look like?Regards,Arunalu
@Deepal Hi Deepal, I have a quick question. In IFS previous version, the supplier shipment was created automatically once we returned the parts from the Receipt screen. Here in 22R2, no shipment is created at the time of returning the parts from the receipt screen, right? Do we always need to create a shipment for supplier return manually via the Shipment screen? Many thanks, NayD Hi NayD,You can create a shipment type with the receipt return option as ‘At Report Return’ and connect this shipment type to the supplier under address > outbound address information sub tab. This will process the shipment automatically.Regards,Arunalu
Hi Paul,I think the best option for you would be to report a case to IFS to see what's causing this. Personally, I have encountered issues with Notify Me, for example, I have seen that the notifications are sent out to all the authorizers instead of the next authorizer and encountered issues when the 2nd authorizer tries to approve the PO without the 1st authorizers approval. The error makes total sense but the fact that notifications were sent out to all the approvers didn't make sense at all.There were no parameters to block this on the touch apps server either and IFS confirmed that the issue which i mentioned were fixed in update 22 and 23. Hope this helps.Regards,Arunalu
Hi Connie,I believe the import and export option is the only way for you to make those visible across users. On the same note, may be you can also explore the use of ‘Save Search’ option/feature, so that you can create filters using fields such as Sales Group or Sales Price Group to narrow down the results or make searches specific to certain records.Regards,Arunalu
Hi @Fredrik Johansson LKP,This is helpful. Thank you.A quick follow up question on this. Do you also have an idea as to why you still have the ‘Supplier Shipment’ and ‘Supplier Shipment Lines’ pages in Cloud 22R2 version then?Also, i saw that on the ‘Site’, we can still see the ‘Finalize Supplier Shipment Automatically’ option. Any idea why?Thanks in advance.Arunalu
I see. Thats good to know. Let me check on this and get back.
I have seen the same issue in 22R1 and 22R2 versions. Could this be a bug or a missing setup perhaps?
hi @Arunalu Why is the qty to pick larger than the CO sales quantity? Hi @paul harland ,This is mainly due to user error. Since pick by choice is enabled, our pickers enter the quantity manually and more often results in picking more than whats on the CO sales quantity.Any thoughts on how to restrict this from happening?Thanks and regards,Arunalu
Hi @Hans Andersen,This does not answer your question exactly but would the ‘pick by choice’ option work for you? I have noticed that a quantity higher that what's mentioned in the CO can be picked and thus can be delivered which meets your requirement of shipping more on a CO than required.Regards,Arunalu
Hi All, Just an update on this. Apparently its not readily available in IFS.
Hi @pramodka46, i agree with Ravinatha on this.But, have you explored this using Storage and Putaway Zones? You can setup rankings and prioritize one over the other etc.Hope this helps.Regards,Arunalu
Hi, would it be possible for you to share a screenshot of the 'Costs' tab and 'Misc Part Info’ tab of this Inventory Part?Regards,Arunalu
Go to search and look up part no '10096950'. Then, in the consists of tab, see if you have part no '10115187'. Hi Arunalu, yes, the part was missing. I put the part no 10115187 there. But I have still the same error message. Thank you for repyling. Best regards Hi Link,Actually it shouldn't be there. Anyways, could you share a screenshot of the consists of tab for both these parts? That might help narrow it down.Regards,Arunalu
Go to search and look up part no '10096950'. Then, in the consists of tab, see if you have part no '10115187'.
Hi Arunalu, As I can see you have used our ID “AW-CUS-L” for both company 20 and 801. I assume if you could change one and make these values unique you might be able to proceed. Coz in one case which was reported previously I found following information Quoted: System raises an error if there are more than one supplier for particular our_id. Unquoted: Please check with that. Thank you! Kind Regards, Sanduni Ranaweera Thank you Sanduni. Yes, that is the reason but in doing so, i cannot accommodate the scenario mentioned earlier. Is there a way to capture this in IFS?Thanks.Arunalu
Hi Arunalu, Can you try adding all sites to valid for site tab of the price list? In Price list you can add sites from different companies. This might resolve this issue. Regards, Sanduni Ranaweera Hi Sanduni,Thank you for this. However, the parts are different in sites so this is not really an option for us.Regards,Arunalu
Thanks @EnzoFerrari for the heads up. Appreciate it. Yes, as soon as i figure out how to change the best answer option, ill do this. Thank you @Rangi Wijewardana for your help as well.
Hi @Carole,In my opinion, your requirement cannot be fully accommodated using Purchase Requisition Authorizations. However, i can think of 2 options.1.Create a new Purchase Requisition Authorization Rule for >500€. This means that all orders with order code 5 & below 500€ will not have any impact, thus catering your 1st requirement. Orders above 500€ will need to be authorized thus giving some control, but this does not mean that users cannot enter PRs with order code 5 which are above 500€.2.Create a new custom event to be triggered at the time of saving a PR line to check if the order code + Total Amount Base (either Gross or Net - your choice) is >500€. If so, give an error message and thus, caters your 2nd requirement. Since this doesn't affect for orders below 500€, this caters your 1st requirement as well. However, technical feasibility of this needs to be ascertained but its a possibility.Hope this helps.Regards,Arunalu
If the parts in ARRIVAL location, is connected to a Purchase Receipt, Connecting those to Handling Units is possible via Receipt window although same is not allowed in Inventory Parts in Stock window. Thank you @Rangi Wijewardana for this. In your opinion, any particular reason as to why it is enabled in Receipt but not in Inventory Part in Stock window?
Hi @XitThejaG , can you elaborate as to how you got there? like the steps followed, invoiced qty on that line etc?
Additionally @Arunalu , if we go with the definitions for Arrival and QA locations (intended for QA / arrival staging right?) I think it makes sense not to enable Packing (as opposed to Picking location definition) in my view Hi @EnzoFerrari, thank you for your quick response.Yes, i was thinking the same and just wanted to check in and see if there was anything else that im missing.Thanks and regards,Arunalu
Hi Roany,Adding to what Pabasara has mentioned above, upon setting up the expiration dates for the parts, a simple lobby element can be created to display the parts which will be expiring in the coming days/weeks so that you can attend to them accordingly. Regards,Arunalu
Thank you for your reply. Indeed we will use this radio button to only see the valid price. Our issue is when we want to use Excel addin to update prices overwhelmingly it’s impossible because in Excel Addin all the lines appears (past price and valid price). If you know how to solve this excel addin issue I will be very please to hear from you, Thanks Olivia Hi Olivia,I actually cannot comment on this without looking at this excel addin. If it is a possibility, I would like to see a sample of this excel addin and then may be I can be of help.Regards,Arunalu
Hi @Arunalu , Adding something to above as you have mentioned that there is no specific page configurations or specially added fields as described by Anushi. You have mentioned that the issue is noticeable in 2 different environments of a client which are newly set up. And also on the other hand there are 2 other environments which this work properly. I hope all these new environments too have the same framework versions and there’s nothing different. If all seems similar, I suggest to report a case as discussed above. Thanks! Hi Lakmini,Yes, all these environments have the same framework version which is 10.11.17.0. And yes, i guess i will have to report this to IFS and see.Thanks again for your help on this.Regards,Arunalu
Hi Olivia,Unfortunately i don't think there is such an option to view the history once it is removed from the customer agreement using RMB option 'Agreement Sales Part Deal History' even in Apps10.However, moving forward, might i suggest that you do not remove the invalid lines. Instead, update the 'Valid To’ field of the existing agreement line (to expire it) and add a new line with the same information and in the new line, under the 'Valid From’ field, have the date which should be effective for the new price.To view only the valid prices from a given date (and to filter the old prices from not appearing), select the radio button 'View with valid Date' and give a date. This will filter the agreement lines and display only the relevant records which is effective as of the given date in 'View with valid Date' field.Hope this helps.Regards,Arunalu
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
