This can be Preformed with one custom field called ( Move to transaction date) and an RMB - Custom menu which either ( if possible) use the modify method, or perform an new transaction on the new date and delete the old transaction. one need to be very clear of when this operation shall be available. Example: After authorization IFS Applications does not allow deletion of the transaction. /
Hi another dimension in this topic, attach Document management documents to outgoing PDF reports. The main purpose is to attach document(s) to Purchase Order and Customer Order for detail tech documents and / or general terms and condition. This has already been implemented as customization at some customers, but it would be very helpful if it is included into Core.
Is there someone who managed to insert an Document management(s) document into an report? We need to create an Order Confirmation including the attached document to the customer order. The attached document is frequently the image of the forwarded invoice to be invoiced with an markup price. Jörgen
We have 1 old transport which remaining for months. It it kinda stuck, we could not neither could not execute nor delete the line. This error always appears when we’ve tried to do so eventhough we counted the quatity at the ‘FROM LOCATION’ to be bigger than the transport task’s quantity. Is there anyone know how to solve it. Have you checked the date for the counting compared to the negative date for reservation. Eventually the date of count in is later compared to the transportation task date. /Jörgen
An solution , not tested, is to allow negative on hand in the part definition, process the transportation task and then restore the Negative on hand checkbox. Please test and give feedback.
Hi I need help in this topic, we have an demand in reporting which can not be met with Report Designer. Can anyone give the documentation of what can be done with the Excel Plugin, or where there is an deeper documentation of it’s usage and it’s limits.
You may have the scenario where the Serial object is returned to Warehouse after repair. This serial object may there after be sold to the other company ( in site 90 as in the example) will this be impossible as the the seral already exist in site 90, or will the full history of the item be available in the new stie? It should be possible to move an serial object between sites. /Jörgen
According to window System information it is Application 10 - Update 10. Work order Version 2.0.0
Thank you Mattias for your very fast answer to my query. We will continue the discussion with @AndreasIsengaard as we already are in the same project. /Jörgen Lind
Thank’s i got the same issue and can be fixed with Ctrl + 0 ( Zoome to 100%)
Please explain BT is a short name of?
It might be as simple as using the “Pen” in some windowos yo need to “open “ the record for edit mode, to be able to update the information. Some of the WO dates are aggregated information from Work Task. so if the fields is not possible to edit open Work task and update the field.
This requirement is highly needed. Looking forward to when it arrives.
I have noticed some repeating issues over the years at multiple of customers.Purchase Order - Attached documents like specific technical documents, General Terms and conditions. Customers want to send these documents in the Event PDF_REPORT_CREATED, but it has to be a modification or configuration to include the attached documents. It would be a great solution to have a generic variable in this Event for Document references of the printout object (Purchase order, Customer order, Work Order etc)The original is fetched over Internet, today one need to check in a hyperlink where a shortcut file in the OS is created and then check in the file. It would be very helpful to set the original as a hyperlink instant on the Metadata of the document. Let connected object follow the process, a configuration window where one may setup a workflow, example in service order. The Connected object is attached in the technician portal, and this document attachment should flow to the work task, sales tran
It was working on the unleached conference last month, the demo was setup for Ahlsell.
Update to new Service pack solved the topic. It is now closed.
Try this select *from ifsinfo.icfr_pro_116b Xjoin IFSAPP.purchase_order Y on X.order_no = Y.order_nowhere x.project_id = '20012' But i do belive you need to go to the old standard for Join tables then you need to do like this select *from ifsinfo.icfr_pro_116b X, IFSAPP.purchase_order Y where X.order_no = Y.order_no and x.project_id = '20012' Both should give the same result
Did you manage to get it to work ?
Hi RoshanF To use PEPPOL for now one need to use an operator, approved for OPEN Peppol community. You will need to use the IFS Standard message FINVOICE to send or receive Invoices, your Operator will need to transform the invoices to and from PEPPOL. Hopefully IFS will Transform to the PEPPOL standard in the future.
There is one more scenario which is relevant. When the item is manufacured and sold in the core process via customer order ro an reseller. Later we get the information of what is the customer of the installation site. At this point we sell an maintenance service contract to the end customer. At this scenario we need / want to change owning customer from customer A to customer B without any struggle we do not want to transfer the ownership via return and new delivery process.
We are not able to proceed with MS about this issue. Can IFS provide assistance, to sort this combability error out, as the issue concerns multiple of customers. We have tried to solve this issue for the last 4 months. We have the same error message as mentioned above.
I agree, when one are able to plan an resource, but not use it in project it is only half ready as a product. We are implementing Resource management at customer from Service and Project perspective, and this flaw is huge for the solution.
Yeah, it is possible to set it up as you describe, but as the customer is a Swedish Government, with around 1400 employees plus a huge amount of consultants to perform time reporting, this setup means one need to setup one record per employee and this means a huge amount of data. Everytime one employee change a cost center one need to update the posting control details. As well when there is an organization change in the future one need to update all records on employee level.What we aim to get is an generic behavior for this customer, and all other customers, to have the same principabe logic for how cost center is determined in the system. I would say that this applies to all customers using Project and Service in the same solution having a code part for cost center. IFS Cloud Resource has got the functionality to fetch the schedule from HCM module, but the expectation is to fetch Schedule and organization information from HCM module into the resource and maintenance module.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
