This will include the questions related to Financials.
- 2,012 Topics
- 6,155 Replies
System automatically authorized to the payment of supplier invoice after preliminary posting when first instalment amount = 0. Below is example of system behavior: Create invoice with payment plan with first instalment amount = 0 Preliminary post invoice First installment was automatic authorized and got status “Paid”, manual supplier invoice got status “PrelPostedAuth”: In my opinion invoice shouldn’t has status “PrelPostedAuth” because it wasn’t authorized to the payment.I asked about it RnD and this is the respond: System has been designed to authorized automatically if the first installment is Zero as there will not be any actual payment happen. In this case, the amount is zero and it is automatically marked as Paid. Then invoice will go to PrePostedAuth state. Likewise, one of several installments are authorized, the invoice will go to status %Auth, either PrelPostedAuth or PostedAuth depending on if you have postings. Furthermore, when you manually authorize the first i
ORA-20105: Invoice.ACCERROR1: Error (Voucher date for payment cannot be earlier than voucher date (28-MAY-22) on which payment on account CUPIA 45 was posted.) occurred while booking Invoice CD
I get following error message when posting the final invoice which is created from the customer order.ORA-20105: Invoice.ACCERROR1: Error (Voucher date for payment cannot be earlier than voucher date (28-MAY-22) on which payment on account CUPIA 45 was posted.) occurred while booking Invoice CD ****The customer order has one advance invoice and settled through the mixed payment. But at the preliminary stage the final invoice has back dated the invoice date. Is that a problem? I tested all possible scenarios and at the final invoice level only forward day can be entered. Please suggest me solution.
Community, We have a request that the notes entered in Posting Proposals window would be able to open to all people which has the permission to use this window, but right now we realized, the notes entered in here is not open for everyone. user can enter their own notes, but can not be seen each other.wondering how we could make it open for everyone?Thank you.
Hi All,One of our customers raised the below concern, Where they are running applications 9 in production and it has Avalara defined and operational. However, during the Upgrade from apps 9 to apps 10 Vertex Q series was activated instead of Avalara in the Company Tax control window. They have made a change, but is this normal? Do we need to make other changes for Avalara?” Best Regards,Peshala
In one of my upgrade project (from Apps8 to Apps9) I see one difference in the postings coming out from expense sheet i.e it is divided into several lines each pertaining to different types of expense, for ex- One line from Mileage, one line from Compensation and one from expense tab, further if Expense tab has three lines for example two for NOK (currency) and one line for EUR then the postings in GL reflects two lines (one clubbed with NOK amount and the other one for EUR). The observation is though currency reflected is in EUR but the final amount is in NOK Earlier in apps8, under the same scenario only one line was posted with currency NOK. Is there anything that we can control on the Expense sheet or in Finance for this case?Observation from Finance-GL account will show all 3 currencies at all time. Transaction currency, accounting currency and parallel currency. Currency is not a control type because the postings in GL will be in NOK as well as currency.
Hi,How do i create a record as follows in supplier payment proposal An invoice of value 1000, pay for 750 using supplier payment proposal.The record should appear in payment proposal as‘Matched amount =1000’‘Paid amount = 750’’‘Withheld tax = 250”Is it possible to create a scenario as above? Do we have a set up for this Best regardsZuha
We are noticing that IFS is trying to authorize credit card transactions for customer orders in our development environment around 1am everyday - even for past orders that have already been charged. We have disabled the credit card type to prevent the transactions from going into “authorized” status.Does know how to stop IFS from scheduling these transactions for orders that have already been completed/paid for or why it keeps trying to authorize these orders? Thanks for your help.
Finance user in Apps9 is attempting to enter a negative customer offset and would like the Write-off Code list of values to be available when entering. Currently that list of values only appears when the amount is a positive offset. Only work around we have found is to create an instant invoice for the positive amount and then enter that offset against it. Does anyone know of a way to configure that Write-off codes to appear with negative offsets?
We have internally developed a customer statement of account using crystal reports , now we want to schedule it in a way that on every month , custom event should pick the list of customers from customer_info address tab where we will define the email. i know few people here used report rules , when i checked the F1 Doc but could not get it. Can anyone share the steps with screen shots.
There is trial balance difference of 238,845.60 as at 1st April 2022. But as per 31st march 2022 TB is tallying. Auditors found few vouchers which tallies to the difference amount from the bank accounts. Following scenarios were tested.The doubtful vouchers correctly posted to the ledger. Back end query executed for manual vouchers- It wont affect the difference No transactions in hold table Executed the preliminary year end and unable to complete it. Back end query executed for difference in the voucher date and payment date for the cash account balance report and the GL balance report.- No transactions could find which has gone to wrong GL account. Checked the summation of the GL balance analysis -Considered all the transaction types.Please suggest me solution to find the difference.
Hello - we have very long lead times on product. Credit card authorizations are only valid for 30 days. The card must be reauthorized at the time of the shipment. Is there an auto authorization for previous authorizations that have gone stale? Or is there an auto authorization at the time of order delivery? Currently we are manually looking at every authorization on the day of shipment to reauthorize the card if the original authorization was more than 30 days ago.Also if a charge is added to the order after the original authorization, the card must be reauthorized for the full amount including the charge before the funds are captured and the transaction becomes a sale.Ideally IFS could run the reauthorization if certain conditions are met: 1-the original authorization is more than 30days old and 2-if charges were added to the order or if the order shipping exceeds the original authorized amount.Thank you!Holly
Is there a way to connect multiple accounts to a corporate or parent account for applying cash? Our goal is to be able to upload invoices from multiple accounts to the account the cash received is instead of manually offsetting which takes a couple of hours when we receive this one customers payment. We’ve updated the accounts with the invoices to include the parent relationship on the credit info and payment screen within customer analysis but when creating the mixed payment the invoices for those customers on not on the list. We are currently using Apps9
The IFS budget templates were never used in my company. Yet it appeared they can be useful for some purposes. Unexpectedly budget templates do not work properly. Having all necessary authorisation rights I cannot change the status of any created budget template (it has status “Planned” as set at creation of the template) - the statuses are visible but not accesible. Due to that I cannot use the templates and cannot even delete the created ones.Any idea what is the reason of such behaviour?Any hint welcomed :)
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.