Is someone can help me on the export control topic ?
Is there an export control expert in the community to help me ?
@Peter Lundgren Yes, of course 😊But I find that unfortunate as we need to navigate to 4 different screens (tool usage report, attribute- categorical and variable Analysis Results) to have the exhaustive list of the tools instances usage.I thought there is a screen which consolidates the data coming from analysis results and shop order operation. What a pity 😕 !Pending this option is introduced in a next release, we are going to create a quick report to meet the need.
Hi community,We are facing the same error message when creating a new routing revision or a new routing alternate. Any idea ?
@david.harmer Will try this API…thanks
@AanHGTS Thanks for your answer. Since no standard functionality can do this, we are using a simple script as you suggested.
Hi @Amila Samarasinghe ,Thanks for taking time to answer to my question. What a pity about the dis-functionalization of this feature today. But I am confident that a positive outcome will be done by IFS to this issue in the near future 😊
@AndreasIsengaard I better understand now. Thanks for your feedback !
Today, most of our documents are created from a template. Consequently, in the 23R1, we are using the assistant “new document from template” or the “create document assistant”.Most of the time, a view copy is required. As these 2 assistants do not support the aurena agent, we are not able to check-in the view copy at the same time of the original document. So, is there another way to benefit the use of a template and the possbility to check back in the document along with the PDF as the view copy without making too many click ? In addition to this, I saw in a post the below screenshot of a microsoft office add-on : Maybe this can do what we expect but the add-on I installed is different...
Hi @EqeMithuV ,Even if the control plan is not active...What a pity !In our purchase flow, we are qualifying a part at the manufacturer which is the supplier but periodically, for timing reasons, we need to purchase the same part from a distributor. The manufacturer is the same but the distribution chain is different.Consequently, we would like to set the acceptance sampling parameters with the same quality levels and inspection frequency on the control plans of the distributors. And as we can have many distributors for the same part, it will be difficult to reach the 20 lots used for qualification in order to have a change in the inspection frequency.
@EqeMithuV Ok, I got it and understood ! Now it is clear from my side and that remains for me to test.Thanks for clarification and the time you spent on the topic.Carole
@EqeMithuV Apologies if I have misunderstood the second point you suggested :Go the purchase order receipt & register the inspection resultI thought you were speaking about the receipt of customer returned parts because I know that in 23R1, we will be able to receive return goods from customer using general receipt process.My blocking point is “how to send the parts from site A to site B” with a shipment, transport task or something like that in order to have traceability in the system and a delivery note
@EqeMithuV Thanks for your suggestion.If I’m not mistaken, it is not possible with 22R2 to receive parts with return material authorization as source ref type. Correct ?
@EqeMithuV The second options sounds to be good but after checking, it requires to have the same part number on both sites...and unfortunately, this is not the case 😒Regarding the 1st option, I have not really understood how to send the parts (through what transaction) from site A to site B. Is it possible to have a kind of “shipment” ?
Thanks @MikeCH for your reply.So, we are going to manage languages as per your suggestion.RegardsCarole
HI @Peter Lundgren Is the 8D report already included in a roadmap for the future or any idea on the release it will be implemented ?ThanksCarole
Thank you to all of you.This is the setting on parts that were missing.Now it is clear for me and it works !
Thanks a lot @LindaK ! Will have a look on it 👍
Thank you so much for this feedback !
@LindaK Did you get the copy of the macro you wanted ?Because we have the same need internally, so really interested to have it :-) Thanks !
Thank you all for your suggestions !We will put these values in the characteristic field
What is strange is that on the receipt, there is a quantity to inspect whereas on the analysis created and confirmed automatically, the sample size to inspect i 0
Hi @dogorman89 ,I checked and nothing is toggled for that control plan except “the acceptance sampling” and “create analysis” by trigger :-(
@ShawnBerk , Thanks a lot for your quick answer.Now it is clear !
@Peter Lundgren Thanks a lot for your feedback and I agree with you on the process.What you suggest seems to meet our requirement.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
