Thanks @Alperen - thought this was probably the case.
Thanks @SandT for your reply. As @wmclennan replied - the date will appear fine in the BA Report design mode/when run via the Excel Add-In but it is when it is run via IFS/BR execution server, that it swaps to a US date format.
Hi @Dilan Senevirathne I’m not clear on the above. My understanding is removing company access at user level, doesn’t remove access to projects - i.e. all projects are visible regardless of company setting on user account? Are you doing this in conjunction with using Project Access and listing individual projects on the Access Definition tab of the team?
Hi @Dilan Senevirathne Dilan Company access is restricted at user level via the user security - i.e. access only given to relevant company/site/user group/GL authority class etc.So my first question is, this doesn’t appear to restrict access to projects & project access has to be used?I was looking at using Project Teams: Team Members - you can select company and wildcard on Employee ID - i.e. include all employees from that companyAccess Definition - Project ID appears to be mandatory - i.e. you can’t just select company & wildcard projects so all projects from that company are included or excluded.
Hi @Dilan Senevirathne Thanks for replying. That doesn’t seem to be the case, as company access is restricted but all projects are visible/editable. This seems to align with IFS documentation re Project Access- it says if it isn’t switched on, all users will have access to the project I don’t have an issue adding ‘company’ to the teams- that is what I want to do- but not have to specify project. I.e. similar to the employee tab in project access where you can enter company & wildcard employee, do the same for the project tab- so all projects in company ABC are included in access for the specified project team.
Thanks @ADDMARIAE - we have deployed all updates for Apps 9 (update 17). As mentioned, it seems to ignore both days with hours that aren’t confirmed, and those with hours that are confimed - even though neither are authorised. The only days that trigger the emails are ‘Blocked’ - where I have confirmed, but it is a Saturday/Sunday and no hours or results exist (and no authorisation either). It seems like a pretty straightforward feature, that I’m surprised if there is still a bug by update 17! I’ll keep testing different scenarios..
Thanks @ADDMARIAE , that has got it working. It only seems to be recognising ‘Blocked’ days as being unauthorised rather than days that are confirmed but not authorised. Do you know what statuses the event looks at?
Thanks @PaulinaPi - it wasn’t a permission issue, as the employee can authorize time in other companies. It’s working now, it was just an issue with the level of the org the position access was granted at within supervisor access.
Thanks @EriLNL , that clarifies the functionality for me. :)
@cperdue - No, there doesn’t appear to be a company option. From what I’ve read on the community, it can be one off the PDF Parameters, but they show as blank, so I think they have to be configured as part of the remittance report design.. Was just seeing if there was another way or something I was missing..
Thanks for replying @cperdue - we’ve got payment advices emailing ok via an event action (the F1 help notes are quite useful though re email reports). My query is specifically relating to being able to set up 2 separate event actions, based around the company the payment advice is being sent from. I can’t see company referenced in the PDF_PARAMETRES, or other fields, so can’t see how to add this as a condition to the action..
Thanks for replying @ShawnBerk - I was hoping there was something out of the box I’d forgotten about, but seems not! I’ll have a look at an event and see if I can make anything work.
hi @rcruz & @lisa.gilesAB - no we never found a solution to this, I think from memory, we just had to create a fresh serial object.
Thanks for your replies, understand canceling/un-matching the invoice would enable the ‘Cancel Receipt’ RMB to be used, however this would be a longer process than our current ‘register inspection results’ option.Sounds like we are using the most efficient method that exists, unless any further replies come through.
Thanks Pradeep, I’ll have a play with those settings and see if I think it will work from the maintenance side. But good to confirm Project Access is the only way to handle this.
Thanks PRODQ for your reply. I can’t seem to get it to accept any SQL in the title, unless there is a particular way to format it. Period 7 is also January rather than July, as it is Financial Year Jul-Jun, so the month option wouldn’t work.
Thanks @SimonSundberg - that’s good to know using IAL is an option to get around the HR access.
There doesn’t appear to be. My only issue with the HR settings, is it actually gives them more visibility than I want - i.e. I only want them to see these employees in the lobby element, but granting org/position access then makes those employees visible in any HR screen they have access to.
Thanks for your reply KasunB - I had tried this, but it grants access to the lobby element, but visible employee absences are still limited via HR restrictions - i.e. require Org Unit & Position Access to be updated. (Same question as Christer above). Perhaps there isn’t a way around this, the only downside is it requires ongoing maintenance as Org Unit access is by individual employee rather than position/I’d rather not open up time reg/absence of all employees, just to be able to view this lobby element.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
