Hi @swargaas ,Did you use the field calendar in the PM Action?I recommend not to do so, The calculation of the maintenance plan will be based on the calendar of the Maintenance organisation. The filed calendar in the PM Action is to make exceptions. So if you have filled it, please remove it and recalculate the maintenance plan.
Hi @CooErikaS ,First thing what come in my mind is teh calendar.The maintenance plan is based on the calendar connected to the Maintenance Organisation.So do not use the calendar field on the PM Action itself. Please check teh Maintenance Organisation Calnedar and check if the date is within the date range of that calendar. When you have checked that and you do not have the calendar field on the PM Action filled, you need to regenerate the Maintenance plan. hopefully this will solve your issue.BR,Robert
That is strange.Did you regenerate the Plan?I cannot check this in a 22R2, I only have 23R1. So not sure if there is a bug in 22R2.In 23R1 it is working for maintenance plan lines in the past.Good luck,Robert
Hi @ACoxUK ,There are some option in IFS10.You can set a default value for the document class per objecte connection: Now the default document class on an equipment object will be 100-3D. In the Object connection you can even set some logic. For equipment object for example, you can defien a different document class per site. Als depending on the format and language you can define different document classes. Besides that you can set an extra access on the document classes, so you can define if a user is allowed to use a specific document class: So this means that you need to be in the goup Administration to create a document with document class 100. If you are not in the group, you cannot select this document class. In both option, also the help text can help you. Hope this is an answer to your question, Robert
Hi @Udanee ,Based on the printscreen I see that this is an old version of IFS (is it 7.5?).I do not have that environment to check, but the issue is that there is a released Requisition to the Work Order. You need to close that requisition first before you can finish the work order. My sugestion is to set the requisitiopn back to planned (with RMB) and then delete the requisition line and requisition header.Please let me know if this answers your question,Robert Kool
Hi @AanHGTS ,What is the logic IFS need to use to do so?If you can define a logic, i guess it is not to hard to create a custom event to do so.Can you let us know in what version you are working, that depends also on the solution and posibilities.Thanks and good luck,Robert Kool
Hi @Anna , can you show the object connections of the three documents of your last printscreen? Then we can check wher it is attached to. if I know that, then maybe I can help you on this.Thanks, Robert
Hi @Buddhika Kurera ,Thanks, always good to have information like this.Is there already an idea at IFS to make it possible to have a default per connection?So when I want to add a document to a work order, that the Create New Document wizard is opened.But when I create a document to a supplier, that the Create Document Assistant is opened.BR,Robert
Thanks @Thommy , I will create a case for this issue. When I have an answer, I will update this tpoic.
Hi @Harm de Brouwer 12Guide , nice to see you in the community!We used these with the IHC project, let me explain in short where we used it for:After a vessel was delivered to the customer, the warranty period starts. This warranty is a project activity in IFS where all cost will be booked against.When a ticket is raised during this warranty period, the case was attached to the project Actvity (as an Attachment).In case a service was required, a work order was created from the case as an handoverrefernece. In case that only a spare part was required, a customer order line was created as another handover reference. It could have been that there was already a work order for the same vessel. In that case it is also possible toconnect the existing work order as a bussiness object.Please note that there is not much happend in IFS in this module, there is also not much focus from RnD. In IFS Cloud the Service management (new) module is improved a lot, so the call center is maybe not even nee
Hi @123IFSME ,Please add some printscreens of the work order with the steps you take.This question is not posisble to answer now for me.BR, Robert
Hi @MiguelAlejos ,First thing which comes in mind, is the Site of the Work Task the same as the Site of the Object?In case that that Site if different, then you should add spare parts of that site to the Object.Please update me on this,Robert Kool
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.