It is slightly related but it doesn’t seem to answer whether it is expected or not.
That is very interesting. I wonder how one would go about creating such an event.
What is E-Learning?
Taking eLearning away from apps10 simply to profit off of teaching IFS and making it harder for your customers to use the software is reason enough for companies to switch ERP systems… There is such thing as new employees that have to learn IFS. This makes no sense.
@ShawnBerk very interested in the videos you mentioned. thank you for sharing. I got the videos. They were from IFS 8 and only navigation. One of them was “How to use the scroll” part in IFS. It sounds like the company didn’t create any learning materials for IFS 10 on purpose to make it so end users have to go to 3rd party companies and pay them for whatever material they may or may not have. Some responses say every company is different but I am pretty sure it’s the same base modules at least.
Hi All, I have having the same issue APPS 10 and have a couple of questions Where can you access the Advanced server settings? I am trying to do the from IFS Apps 00 but cannot see Advanced server settings on here. What should you set the fixed date to , one in the past or the future? Thank you Susan Same boat
We are having this issue as well. We had the issue during testing but were told it would “likely work” when we go live with Apps 10. Here we are now needing to run a forecast and are getting the same error. It seems like no one has an answer for this. We checked the same things as you as well.
Is this happening for just 1 user or all users?
Interesting. Are you using Edge to launch IEE?
Try running this in Command Prompt as Admin.rundll32 %windir%\system32\dfshim.dll CleanOnlineAppCache
Hi @craryit, Is the user running the report added to the new site? So can the user see the data? You can check e.g. by using “Sites per User” BR Martina Hi! Thank you for the reply. Yes the user is added to the site. Thank you!The app owner account is showing the same as well.
@craryit can you please also check if user IFSSYS is added to the site? That did the trick! I am not sure why but it set my previous post as the best answer.
Level 0 is a active family part used I ly for planning purposes. That is not a physical product. The top level of the real physical product is normally level 1. So we don’t need to be using Level 0 parts? When you say Level 1 is the top level, that means the whole product, not the components? I have seen many resources that say Level 1 is just components.
Hi @craryit, Firstly, no problem arises with the current way you are using MS. MS level 1 parts are the parts which can actually be manufactured or purchased. MS level 0 parts are non tangible parts and are used if your forecasts are based on the product family level and not at the actual product (SKU) level. Consider a simple example , if you have forecast for just a Cars then MS level 0 will be your Car and MS level 1 will be Diesel Car & Petrol car. You can define a planning structure to determine how the forecast need to disaggregated from MS level 0 to MS level 1 Hope this helps!! Regards, Mithun K V That makes sense. I am getting so many different answers when researching this. I am guessing it’s other ERP’s that use Level 0 and Level 1 differently.
Yes. You don't need to use level 0. It's Completely optional, but useful if you want to forecast on this fictive family level and have a planning structure to disaggregate it to the top level of the real part structure which is level 1. The master production schedule created on level 1 is then exploded by MRP to lower level components in the BOM. Okay so The level 0 would be the whole product put together, and tells us whats inside the bom? Then the MRP knows which LEVEL 1 component parts are a part of it? So to use BOM’s in IFS, we have to use Level 0 at least? Right now we are trying to figure out how to work with planning for components of a product. It seems like just using Level 1 does not do that?
Hi @craryit Yes, when you create a Customer Order with a Package Part, it will check the Availability of Package Components if Components are set Active for the Availability Check. That is awesome! Do you know on what screen to set them to Active for Availability Check?
Hi @craryit You do it in Inventory Part Record, under Misc Part Info tab, Thank you very much!
Hi, If I have understood your requirement correct, I think the Package Part concept in IFS Cloud/Applications could be used to achieve this. You can define a Sales Part to be a Package Part and then define the components included in the Package Part. In the Customer Order you are selling the Package Part and the components are reserved, picked, etc. Best Regards Fredrik Hello,That’s what my current assumption is as well. I keep hearing back from my user that when they enter a customer order with a package part, it doesn’t look at the availability of the components. However, on the new question on IFS community someone has told me it does check for components. I assume it does work this way because it wouldn’t make much sense if it didn’t.
We have set the part up as Manufactured and processed on a Shop Order. A bit heavy-handed but just another alternate. I think we found we couldn’t easily manage seeing shortages using Package Parts ( I may be wrong - it’s bee a while!) That was the other option we were thinking of. The downfall is having our shipping team doing this.
Hi @craryit, Do all users get this error or only your account? Please check whether FND_WEBENDUSER_MAIN permission set is granted to the user. Furthermore, you can try refreshing Aurena caches by following the instructions mentioned in this article: Hope this helps! Hello, Thanks for the reply. We are for sure using this permission set. I was also able to clear the cache. Although these are not working still.
Can I ask what you mean by ‘shortage date’? Linda From my understanding, they use shortage date as a date they will no longer have inventory available. So if they have inventory today and they look up the shortage date it could show a date of a month from now and that’s the date we can expect to run out. The date I am using currently is for sure a customization so it’s possible nothing like it exists in out of box API’s.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
