We want to know how one of the calculation in Eco-footprint is done in relation to the status of a product structure and is it possible to adjust this calculation?The referred calculation is this, highlighted in the screenshot.We observe the calculation only includes product structures in status buildable. We have multiple product structures which are used by our suppliers and thus never set to buildable. We want to have that included in the calculation.Could you please confirm, the calculation only includes product structures in status buildable?Is it possible to modify the calculation to include product structure with any status?
HIIf we have sold a manufactured part with a large serialized structure, but didn’t create the Serial Objects as part of the process (“Create SM Object” not set on CO line) – what is then the easiest way to create the full serial object structure for that part afterwards?I know objects can be created manually using “Serial Object” window or using the “Make Maintenance Aware” window, but both creates only one object at a time and not the underlying structure.BR Kristian
HiDoes anyone know where I can find an overview of the “Virtual Maps”-functionality?We don’t have the module and would like to know what it can do before we buy it. BR Kristian
HiDoes anyone know why Work Order Returns does not appear in Inventory Part Availability Planning in APPS10? For large planned repairs you cannot necessarily say that this is unplanned supply. Such returns can possibly be very expensive reusable parts that could/should be considered as a supply for other repairs.Is it possible to have these shown (e.g. based on work task dates) in Inventory Part Availability Planning and is it possible to include these planned part returns as supplies in the MRP calculation?BR Kristian
HiAnyone know how we can change a Sales part from non-inventory to inventory? We want to use the same part number for the inventory sales part such that our sales personnel and customers don’t have to worry about it.Br Kristian
HiIn a scenario where we are purchasing lot/batch controlled parts for our manufacturing processes we want to have a high-level report per lot/batch.The report needs to provide an overview of a given lot/batch or several lot/batches for customs authorities. In essence the report must tell what quantity of the lot/batch do we havein inventory in inventory as a component in a manufactured part (at any level of the structure of the manufactured part in inventory) in WIP (that is when 1. the lot/batch itself or 2. a part containing the lot/batch as a component is issued to a Shop Order where the product is not yet finished) Issued to customer through Customer Order or ProjectI’m aware of the lot-batch master but finds that this provides a way to find the non-aggregated details.Hope someone can help.BR Kristian
Hi After upgrading to APPS 10, we see that some document revisions have a new set of access lines with object Type = JTTask. I understand that this relates to Work Tasks and that the document is attached to a work task. However, I am not sure what this access lines does EXACTLY and which users will be granted access to the document based on that access line: BR Kristian
HiIn apps 10 update 8, we want to start using Cost Per Condition for some of our parts as we e.g want to valuate refurbished part to 65% of a new part. Are there a way to do this automatically such that a certain condition “REFURBISHED” is always set relative to the standard cost? Also, preferrably the Level Cost Details are also set relative the the cost buckets of the standard cost. BR Kristian
HiOn IFS 10 update 8, it seems that approval on training registrations are no longer needed. When consulting the F1 help, it seems that automatic training approval is optional. However, I am unable to figure out where this is controlled. Has anybody figured this out? BR Kristian
Hi When I create a custom page with read-only columns, I cannot enable LOV when I search the read only columns in the custom page. Does anyone know a workaround to this? Here’s an example: I create a custom page with these three columns: Customer ID: Persistent field with LU reference to CustomerInfo Form of business: Read-only field using custom fields implementation type = “Referenced value” to show the form of business of the customer entered in column 1. Open Sales orders: Read-only field displaying the count of open orders for the customer entered in column 1. A configuration like this could serve as a dashboard by a department to monitor a set of critical customers on a particular day or similar. This type of configuration can be quite useful (in particular when including a “user” column such that further configuration can allow users to work on the page independently of each other. However, considering above basic scenario - when a user want to filter the records on the cus
Does anyone try to create a matrix lobby element? Mine are not working, despite using valid data sources. Turning on the debugger, reveals that there’s a sorting in all matrix lobby elements that I create: “order by MAX_PARTICIPANT desc”. That is disregarding the data source used. We’re on IFS10 update 3.
Does anyone have a suggestion on how we can track who and when lobbies are being used in apps 10? Or course we can create an API with a get-function that updates a history table when called, but I wonder if anyone came up with something more elegant or had a discussion with IFS on this? One of the recent updates enables this for quick reports and this is a great tool which can help us identify which reports are important and which could be phased out (we have 2000 reports build over many years).
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
