Hi @EqeMithuV @EqeRobertK thank you so much for your explanations. It was helpful.
@Mathias Dahl thank you very much
Hi @EqeMithuV Thanks a lot worked for me
no sir
Hi, @EqeMithuV I have a question here. what if the PM is NOT connected to the rule ID and I have generated the WOs for future dates then the system should work exactly the same as above but it's not. Possible reason?
Hi Mathias,thank you for the response. No idea about your suggestion could you please elaborate? BR
thank you @Charith Epitawatta , will try this and share my feedback on it very soon. thanks again.
@PennyB I am also having the same issue, can you please suggest me the steps how exactly you resolved this ?
No since I am very much new to HR module, can you please tell me the steps to do so ? thanks for the reply
what is the significance of having attribute level 90 and attribute level blank ?
thanks Karolina for the explanation, let me try this and will confirm this if the worked or not . thanks again.
Thanks karolina, you are super. it worked.
Hi @First Employee I am also facing the same issue, have you found the solution? appreciate if you can share
Hi Everyone, if the was solved by the data repair can you please suggest me the script ? or solved by any another way apppreciate if you could share the same . Thanks in advance
in the listed values (location) is 144 which is seen in the picture. the is the same location on which the part was received. coming to the access part I am using IFSAPP and getting the same error, and user also has the access.
@KethakaG we are using ifs9
here you go, those are the parameters. basically I am including everything this is IFS8
here is the setup and the scenario. in the below image I ran a count report for the specific bay i.eTCM1 as you can the there are some parts which are selected for counting and some are not.(by frozen checkbox since it is not possible to send the entire report)and here is the setup let me know if these details are adequate
Hi @Matthew , it appears that the unselected parts are not linked to any specific release. After checking customer orders and shipments, it has been confirmed that there is no association with them.@LKACH Regarding the method for the unselected parts, it seems that the majority of them are categorized under method A, while the rest fall under method B. @ROVECH unfortunately the parts are not there in any other counts reports. :- ( If you need any further clarification or assistance, please feel free to let me know.& thanks
Hi, the parts are not there in other count reports. Unfortunately, the part does not fall under any of the planning methods mentioned above O, K, and T. & these part are also not associated with any release, shipment, or reservations.
This issue if only for some of the lines and for some of the line we can change
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.