Afternoon all, We are hitting an issue in Apps 8 when running longer scripts in the SQL Tool, is anyone aware of how to extend the character limit here?Many thanks,Hayley
Afternoon,I am pretty sure the answer is No, but does anyone know if its possible to connect the Causes in Service and Maintenance to Object Categories in Apps 8? What we are trying to achieve is if an Object is of a certain category, then when we come to report on a work order what the cause of the fault was, that the LOV only displays causes which relate to that object category type.I cannot see anything obvious to link them, but thought I would ask to see if anyone has been able to achieve this.Kind regards,Hayley
Afternoon,We currently use Service & Maintenance along side the mWO App in Apps 8 and would like to know if anyone has found a way of putting a work order on hold via IFS and not through the App. There is the option on the mWO App to put a work order on hold which feeds back to IFS (as per the below screen shot), but there is no way that I can see where you can do this without using the App (not all of our engineers use the app).I know you can put the operations part of the work order on hold, but not all our work orders contain operations so this is not ideal.Thanks in advance,Hayley
Afternoon Community,Is there anyone currently using the mWO App on Apps 8 that has set up the Purchase Request function for NoPart requisitions? Also for the Part or Material requisitions, anyone that has set this up, have you found that by pushing all inventory parts to the phone has affected the performance of the app?Thanks in advance,Hayley
Afternoon, We have added a custom tick box field on Active Work Order, but when a work order is set to Finished all the information on Active Work Order is removed and recreated in Historical, therefore there is no data for the custom field to refer back to on the Active Work Order as it no longer exists. I was wondering if anyone has overcome this in Apps8? Many thanksHayley
HiHas anyone come across an issue with LU’s losing their connection to Base Tables in Apps 8? I have just amended an existing published custom field, but when I went to re-publish I got an error saying the LU isn’t connected to a Base Table. When I check the Logical Unit it is no longer connected but it is was before and still is in our other test database.Any information would be greatly appreciated.Hayley
HiI have created 3 new custom numeric fields, 2 will be manual entries and the 3rd I would like to add the numbers from the first 2 fields. Is this possible in Apps 8?If so does this need to be done via a custom event? Would be much appreciated if it is possible for some to send a screen shot of how. Below is a screen shot of the fields I am referring to, and the one circled is the field I want the calculation to appear.
We use the object connections quite heavily in Apps 8, especially on Project Navigator, and I was wondering if anyone has been able to add an additional column to these, particularly the Risks object connection. I am looking to include the status column which can be found if you RMB to the Risk Analysis Navigator, however the object connection screens do not give the option to create a custom field. Does anyone know of another way this can be done? TIA
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.