one more question is once it is approved, can it be revoked by approver? how does it happen?ThanksSusan
Hi VikasThanks for your help, now it does work. ThanksSusan
Hi VikasThanks for your quick response. I try to delete expense one, the same error message pop up as below. what is the reason?ThanksSusan
Thanks for your quick response.we are now in IFS APP10, UPD19, but it does not work. What UPD # you work?ThanksSusan
hello DharshanDo you have any feedback for the document for this configuration flow? please advice.ThanksSusan
Hi MagnusThanks for your feedback. now it is clear.Have a nice day!Susan
hello DharshanHow about the document progress? please help to advise. ThanksSusan
hello DharshanThat is good idea. Look forward to your document. Have a nice day!ThanksSusan
one more
hello, Thanks for your quick replyPlease find screenshot of configuration ID for setting. any other missing? ThanksSusan
Hi MartinThanks for your quick response, it is a helpful reply.If set up a special expense rule for this individual employee, it is for this rule purpose. But if want to connect to other purpose, the expense rule field is as default as assignment rule and can not select any others. How to handle this?ThanksSusan
Hi MithunThanks for your quick feedback.So I will raise a case to IFS support. Have a nice day!Susan
Hi MithunThanks for your quick response. So we will have custom event to make it happen. Have a nice day!Susan
Hi MikeThanks for your reply. I think the inspection qty should follow the inspection code in control plan, which will specify per each “Data point” and “Test operation no” . Yes, the “IQC inspection rule” is customization by our developer. Do you think this issue is a bug as Peter mentioned? I think it should be. ThanksSusan
Supplier for purchase part
Hi MikeThanks for your time to check this. Below is the entire purchase order analysis. ThanksSusan
Hi MikeThere is no any “Inactive” process and only one site and one supplier for this part and no more receipts missing.ThanksSusan
Hi MikeThanks for your quick response. I attach the revision as below, all are the same revision. ThanksSusan
add receipt data for your reference.thanks
HelloCan anyone have solution for this activity? Please help to advice. ThanksSusan
Hi AntOlivFrThanks for your suggestion. Does that mean if we have 5 levels of sample size matrix, we should set up 5 alternate routing and 5 control plan to match them, then after shop order lot size fall to that slot, IFS will pick up that control plan to analysis shop order? Am I right?But this approach will increase workload of at least 3~10 times for business daily operation, right?ThanksSusan
Hi AntOlivFrThanks for your proposal. Yes, the control plans are attributed to the routing alternate, but normally it is not possible to active many version/alternate of routing in practice . The shop order quantity depends on customer’s demand and can not be fixed. and fluctuation. The Acceptance sample function is not suitable for our company business which can not be used as well.Can I suggest IFS to consider this requirement in the IFS further upgrade process to make it happen to meet customer need? ThanksSusan
Hi PeterThanks for your response, do we have any other alternate solution to solve this issue? please advise. ThanksSusan
Hi DameendaThanks for your quick response. It is helpful for our business. Have a good day!Susan
Hi MatsThanks for your quick response and suggestion. But for over supply message, how to evaluate the reduce qty to compare with net requirement of which period? ThanksSusan
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
