@bapehu HI,This will require a data repair. You should log a support ticket. There was an issue like this in our App75 version (solution 185064) but am not aware of this issue in App10. thanks
This has been this way since I believe our 2003 version of the software. You should see that one is marked as fully used. This was a programming change to track the payment on accounts.This functionality had changed because special CheckPOA were not shown in Payment Proposal, Automatic Offset Proposal, Mixed Payment, etc. Now this normal POA which is created can be shown/matched in all places.
@ronhu HI Ronhu,I suggest you create another load type with Q voucher in this window and then when loading Q vouchers pick the load type that belongs to the Q voucher. ThanksNancy Fink
reference solution: 283078
@ronhu Hi, You should be able to load Q vouchers. Please check External Voucher basic Data to confirm you have Q voucher setup with a load type.Not sure if you are loading the voucher type in your file -- if so ..make sure you only have 1 voucher type referenced per file. ThanksNancy Fink
@Polash Have you gone to the tax ledger parameters and changed the tax base amount? I have not tested as I have not heard of this requirement.If below does not provide your results (NOTE: you would need a new invoice/paid after changing below) - then recommend you provide documentation on that requirement and log an idea so it can be reviewed if it is indeed a legal requirement. Tax Base Amount:Select the method for handling of tax base amount for partly deductible tax. Original: The amount on which tax is imposed will be used.Reduced: The amount will be used, but it will be adjusted in a way that the deductible tax amount as a percentage of the net amount is always equal to the specified tax percentage. Cost: The difference between the gross amount and the deductible tax amount, that is the cost amount on relevant invoice line will be used.
@Polash Per: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1099mec.pdfState or local sales taxes. If state or local sales taxes are imposed on the service provider and you (as the buyer) pay them to the service provider, report them on Form 1099-MISC as part of the reportable payment. However, if sales taxes are imposed on you (as the buyer) and collected from you by the service provider, do not report the sales taxes on Form 1099-MISC. Per above -- since they are the buyer and sales tax is being charged (imposed) on them and the supplier is getting paid the sales tax -- then it should not be reported. If you(customer) interpret this differently -- and or has documentation to state otherwise --then we IFS would need to get the US Country representative to review.
@Polash HI Polash,Well… sorry - I am not sure what you did different between the different environments. I would suggest a support case so we can review why when you run the calculate income it is not calculating anything.
@Polash I suspect creating the 0 WHT manually is your issue. This should be created by the application when creating a new company. If the company already existed w/o the 0 WHT then the update company should be used to create the 0 WHT. Do you have another company you can test above in?
@Polash You ran the calculate income??Is the trans code PP49? You wouldn’t get it with the tax code of 10. Did you manually create the 0 WTH tax code or was that created by the system when you either created a new company or ran the update company? I’m assuming there is an income type on the transaction.It would be better if you provided your test plan on how you set this up -- etc. and the complete details of the tax transation
when you run the tax proposal --- are the transactions pulled into the proposal?? I assume the answer is no to above. Did you run the calculate income amount? when you go to tax transactions -- is the fetched boxed checked and in the income amount field is there a value?
looks like you are on App75 and this is a possible bug in App75 -- solution: 156102 bug ID 75557.I would log a support case and reference that solution and bug Id
Have you logged a support case???
Does your customer have a credit control group setup?? (customer- order tab- general tab)It is necessary to have credit control group on your customer so the system knows at what points in order flow you wish credit to be checked
Here is a basic testplan: tax report -- create a tax report for misc using the template: S100 and tax group: US 1099 Misc create a second one using the template: S101 and tax group: US 1099 NEC NOTE: the tax groups should automatically pull in when selecting your template if you completed step 1 correctly2) supplier -- make sure your supplier is setup for report income/withheld --- RMB to tax reporting withholding and make sure supplier income type is setup and default tax withholding code is: 0 WHTNOTE: if 0 WHT is not already existing in customer database -- you should use update company to update tax codes -- DO NOT MANUALLY ADD(company -- RMB update company -- specify LU - unselect all - -then select statutory fee under accrul and update from the STD-US template- okay. Make sure you have non-account related logical units and account related logical units checked NOTE: if you did not have 0 WHT setup in tax codes and on you
Did you setup the payment method on the customer and flag it as their default?
You can use the customer repayment function there will be basic data setup -like in payment documents you will have to setup the customer repayment series and the way of payment you use in the payment proposal has to be on your customerBasic test plan:customer payment proposal - RMB and create repayment proposal - go to details and make sure your invoice that was overpaid is thereRMB and acknowledge payment proposalRMB and create payment orderCustomer payment order - find your order - RMB and create check payment
@MonaL HI Monal, In order to fix -- go to the posting section of the invoice --- add a posting line to put the invoice in balance - save and on the header RMB and post. ThanksNancy Fink
CUPIA’s are reserved for the application to do an automatic offset. It is never recommended to do a manual offset of the CUPIA’s. You can try above in your test database -- make sure you take both orders all the way through to the final invoice with your testing -- I would anticipate an error on the final invoice as the system will not be able to do the automatic offset. I would instead recommend you cancel the customer payment to the AD if possible and apply it to the correct advance invoice
@CBRUEL You should be able to create a CD invoice via the normal CO flow and advance invoice flow. I recommend you go to your customer -- click on the order- misc customer and check how the invoice type is setup -- could be setup as collection. Above is just one setting to check
That sounds like possibly an issue with the customer order itself and not an issue with the Advance invoice process flow. Or possibly you have customer setup to create collective invoice...What does quick order flow show as the next step? If you do a customer order for the same customer/part without the advance invoice are you able to create the final invoice?
When you create and print the customer order invoice -- the system will automatically offset the payment from the advance invoice to the CD invoice
If you go to account -- query for 1980 - click on the demands tab -- how are they setup? In posting controls -- PP1 -- do you just have account setup?
Unfortunately I have never been able to recreate this --- I suspect a user ending their task while report running -- but I was never able to recreate that in our CORE product
I have seen this get locked before in older versions. (solution ID: 50558). I’m not sure if the sql’s in that solution would still be valid in the version you are running. You can try running below sql and if you have anything returned you may need to log a support case to get the status changed to a 3. Select a.company, a.column_template_id, a.row_template_id, b.report_id, b.instance_id,b.rowversionfrom report_template_tab a, finrep_archive_tab bwhere a.company=b.companyand b.status=1and a.report_id = b.report_id
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
