@mksouthwick Seems like it is working as you expect in App 10.As long as material already issued to Shop Order is used (consumed), the “Scrap Non-Issued Material” tab is what is available.
As Praveen mentioned, it is not possible to create new revisions for multiple parts in one action. Creating a new revision is a conscious decision you need to make, aiming to do significant changes with the new revision. Would be interesting to know the business scenario and that you would like to create new revisions for multiple parts in one go.
I don’t think it is possible. A WIP report is a snapshot of what is the Work In-progress at the time of the report run.
Appreciate your effort. I am not using Cost Sources. Just Posting Cost Group connected to Cost Bucket.
Not sure how it functions in 2003. Do you want to capture the real-time spent on making tools? Otherwise hope you can auto-report the time specified on routing at the Shop Order receipt.
What issues you have using Shop Orders for making tools? By the way time for an upgrade :)
Valid date is 1/1/2018 from the begin and the transaction date is on 19/05/2021
Thanks, @Tharindu Illangasinghe.I was trying with the Standard Cost and Cost Level = Cost Per Part. May I know why it is not designed to work with Standard Cost and Cost Level = Cost Per Part?
Thanks for your responses.The business requirement is the same as M41 connect with C47, where the variances also should go to different GL accounts based on work center and labor.
If you want to check the variance for closed Shop Order again Transaction Code, you can use the Inventory Transactions History window too.
Control Plans are set up to create Analysis where you register your results. It could be you measure something or a visual inspection. The Analysis results can later use in SPC (Statistical Process Control) charts as well where you can see the trends and take necessary actions before things get worse.MRB is different, where you create an MRB case when you come across a nonconformance, where you can’t take an immediate decision and need some expert advice on what to do. Eg. Say as a control parameter you check the Color of your product. If the Color is quite OFF than the expected color you can straight away scarp (depend on the business). But in a situation where you can’t make a decision, you register the Analysis result as not within specification and create an MRB and assign it to relevant staff to carry out the MRB. After a further inspection of it, MRB will decide what to do. It would be use as it is, scrap or rework or send back to the supplier, etc. This could be crucial especia
If you want the control plans to be Part based not process based, I believe that you do your analysis at the end of the process. If that is the case, you can use Control Plan – Inventory instead of Control Plan – Manufacturing. So you perform Analysis for a specific part at a specific location. Could be the outbound location of the last operation.
More about the issue,Control Type C47 and C48 not available for Variance Posting TypesControl Type C47 (WORK CENTER FOR ROUTING) and C48 (LABOR CLASS FOR LABOR ROUTING) not available for Variance Posting Types such as M123, M131, M132, etc.Because of this, I can’t map variances based on the Work center or Labor class.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.