Hi @ShadowWizard I know Location Group is not standard IFS functionality for the FIND_INVENTORY flow. I read in another forum it’s possible to add CF’s in WaDaCo in ‘Custom Menus’. So maybe it is also possible to add a ‘Item Detail ID’ without contacting IFS??Br
Hi,Thanks for above recommendations / information's. We still use Zebra TC21 in our factories. After we fixed the certificates and internet connection it works quite well. Br
Hi @dsj Thanks for above answer. Wasn’t aware of Query Flags until now. I’ve added them and it works perfectly!! Thanks for helping me out and knowledge sharing :)Cheers!
Hi,This is correctly understood.Shared User on Scanner → which production user made transaction XXX.
Hi ,Thanks for your answers above.It’s correct our WaDaCo scanner users are shared Oracle Users. I was aware we could handle it in different ways. For example create personal users for wadaco etc. But this solution is very expensive in full licenses.I though there might be a functionality for WaDaCo that could indicate which user who made a transaction on a shared scanner(other companies have the same setup as us). Unfortunately, there is no way IFS can handle this currently.. But thanks for above inputs Br
Hi , Thanks for your answers above. It’s correct our WaDaCo scanner users are shared Oracle Users. I was aware we could handle it in different ways. For example create personal users for wadaco etc. But this solution is very expensive in full licenses. I though there might be a functionality for WaDaCo that could indicate which user who made a transaction on a shared scanner(other companies have the same setup as us). Unfortunately, there is no way IFS can handle this currently.. But thanks for above inputs Br Hi @Christian Cordius maybe you can think about LTU (limited) licences for WaDaCo. Hi, Is it possible to use LTU (Limited) licences for only WaDaCo use? Our scanners have a unique oracle user only for scanning purposes on a scanner device. These users aren’t used anywhere else. Br
Hi , Thanks for your answers above. It’s correct our WaDaCo scanner users are shared Oracle Users. I was aware we could handle it in different ways. For example create personal users for wadaco etc. But this solution is very expensive in full licenses. I though there might be a functionality for WaDaCo that could indicate which user who made a transaction on a shared scanner(other companies have the same setup as us). Unfortunately, there is no way IFS can handle this currently.. But thanks for above inputs Br Hi @Christian Cordius maybe you can think about LTU (limited) licences for WaDaCo. Hi, Is it possible to use LTU (Limited) licences for only WaDaCo use? Our scanners have a unique oracle user only for scanning purposes on a scanner device. These users aren’t used anywhere else. Br Hi @Christian Cordius yes, why not? But you can’t generate it by yourself. Discuss it with an IFS consultant. I
Hi @Christian Cordius we are integrating IFS in our company and we thing about LTU licences for wadaco. But the issue is you are not flexible with LTU. If you want to change something in the permission you have to generate it again. Because you can’t change a LTU permission set. Hi,It’s correct. However, if these licenses only are used for scanning purposes it makes sense to consider. At least from my company’s perspective.Br
Believe the PL/SQL expression is simply expecting the SYSDATE or TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,’yyyy/mm/dd’) e.g. below Thanks!! I can see it works :) Do you know if it’s possible to not make the field not editable before saving the line? Do you know what i’m asking for?Br
Believe the PL/SQL expression is simply expecting the SYSDATE or TO_CHAR(SYSDATE,’yyyy/mm/dd’) e.g. below Thanks!! I can see it works :) Do you know if it’s possible to not make the field not editable before saving the line? Do you know what i’m asking for? Br Depends on the client which you're using. If Aurena, you can simply untick the ‘Editable’ checkbox in page designer. in IEE i think it can be done via a RMB → Properties and set the field to read-only. But not completely sure if it works for CF. Didn't test. Hi,I just tested ‘read only’ on the two custom fields set in properties. I can see it works as expected. It’s not possible to edit when a new line is created. Thanks for knowledge sharing/sparring!! Cheers,
HiI tried with both IFSAPP.incoming_invoice2 and &AO.incoming_invoice2. It’s still not possible ..
Hi Dharshan, I’m aware of the WDR option. However, these parts are moved with WDR = ‘*’. I challenged the business regarding this and suggested to look into the process / another setup. Unfortunately, it’s to big a task for them right now.. Do you know if IFS got some standard functionality to accommodate this? So the part can be moved to a location with different exp. dates where exp. date = to location? Br
Hi @MiLeNL I didn’t manage to create an excel_migration job which can delete records for scanner users. I tried to use a different migration job and was able to delete records with it. Instead i used a MIGRATE_SOURCE_DATA job and created two sql codes for deleting all records or only some of the users to a specific scanner. Appreciate your input - even though i didn’t manage to make it work through the excel_migration job. Thanks!Br
Hi Zani, I tried with the loop function and it didn’t help. I’ve also tried to execute as background job which didn’t help either.It correct each session is executed separately in my configured MOVE_PART flow. However, before IFS starting execute the movement, it will first go through all records which will be moved and afterwards IFS makes the movement. I think this is a bug because it should only consider one line in each session. Now IFS tries to execute ‘all’ records and it times out. It not taking one line at a time.MOVE_PART are using Inventory Part in Stock. However, when I’m starting to look into the from location, i have already narrowed down records, so it is only approximately 65 wadaco will handle. I think this is manageable for the scanner.We’re already cleaning up the inventory part in stock table for zero quantity records each day with a scheduled job. In regards to your other question we’re only cleaning up sessions which is <> Completed. I can see we still have C
Also, do you have an idea on how to configure the scanner so it’s possible to move all records from one location to another in an efficient way?Thanks!
Hi Dario,The flow is configured to execute one stock move per session. However, this is not the case. When I use the configured MOVE_PART flow on the scanner, for some reason, it seems like the flow is going through all lines and executing all of them at once. A session is created per stock move after the execution is confirmed, but before the execution of the flow happens, the flow goes through all lines on the location and makes the movements afterward. I find it quite hard to describe, so I have attached examples of two scenarios where it works and where it is not working. The timeout occurs when executing the configured flow on a location with more than 40 records. Please see the attached zip file, and remember to view the files in the correct order, 1, 2, 3, and so on (remember it is two scenaios, so you need to consider works and not works). If this does not make sense, please let me know.I have cleaned up the session table, but it did not work. The table in our test environment
Hi PhilThanks for noticing me. I can see i posted in wrong forum :) Br
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
