This is solved. The user did not have a period set on their Employee File record.
Hi Nethmini, I performed the steps you suggested in the previous post. The user is reporting that on some work orders, he can allocate TSHEPARD to the work order. It seems that there is more than one problem happening here. I am going to stop working on this for now as we have IFS success working with the maintenance team soon and this subject will be addressed then. Thanks for your help.
Hello Anmise, I apologize that I’m probably not explaining the problem well. For other maintenance person resources, their name can be dragged from the top part of the screen to the bottom part to place them in schedule. In the case of TSHEPARD, the user cannot be dragged to the bottom part of the screen to place him in the schedule.
Hello Anmise,I am not seeing an “Apply Constraints” option in the allocaiton screen. See below:
Our maintenance manger is trying to allocation a user as a resource on an active work order, but cannot. Here are screen shots of the user (TSHEPARD) setup. As far as I can tell, the user is set up similarly to other users that can be allocated. The one part I haven’t been able to check from the IFS help is the “Scheduling Basic Data” page but I cannot find it in IFS. Thank You
I’m pretty sure that it must have been a customization. I’m still new to all of this but I don’t see any reference to this technical class characteristic in IFS docuementation.
Solved. Had to set technical class AUTO-RELEASE PO FOR PO TRANS SUPPLIER to YES on the supplier record as shown in attached image.
Thank you for your quick response, Matt. These fields look good on the part for both suppliers, so something else must be factoring in somewhere.
The auto PO creation for these parts is still not working for us. I must me missing something. I have the parts set up as Primary Supplier Transit. They were added to Customer Orders and then the Customer Orders were released. Purchase Requisitions were created for the parts but no PO’s. We have other parts that are set up correctly and I’ve compared them to the recently changed parts but can’t find anything out of order. The person who successfully did this last time has left the company. Any ideas?
Thank you WyrLeeLeW!I will use this infor to do more investigation and testing and report back when I have some answers or more questions.
When I granted permissions to Media Panel, the desired functionality returned. Thanks for all help offered!
Thanks for all these helpful suggestions! It looks like we didn’t grant all of the items for DocumentHomeB2B in our new permission set as shown below. I’ll check on the the other places you mentioned.
Hello Mathias,Thanks for your reply to this. We are on Client 10.9.15.0 and Server 10.9.7.0.Kevin
I had no idea that you could do that. I’ll run it by my team members and see what they think about it. Thanks for your suggestions!
Thank you both for your reply. I’ll try the ‘hide access’ approach and see if it is acceptable for the company.
Hi BOAABAIN,Thank you for looking at my post. I checked all the parts involved in this cost roll and none had this checkbox active on their inventory part record. The problem must lie elsewhere. But thank you again for trying to help out! Kevin
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.