Thanks Thomas, I have found this and attempted to run for a single period for one of our companies within our test environment. Unfortunately this was unsuccessful, the job run for about 15 hours before I eventually killed the session. I think our issue fundamentally is the amount of data already in the table, I don’t believe we have ever archived any of these records so volume has been building from 2013 onward, total 1.3bn per company, on average 400mn per company.It’s either this, or we are also considering that we have recently gone through a data centre migration and have had our instance of IFS rebuilt from scratch. It’s possible that a previous release has been missed in relation to GL Voucher Row Analysis which is affecting the querying of the data.Frustrating either way and no doubt some level of housekeeping would have helped!!
That makes perfect sense as it’s essentially what has happened. Will look to amend these to the absolute path.Thanks Tomas.
Thanks Pete, the screenshot is really useful. Oddly, the majority of the senders affected are our own rather than the standard IFS. This coupled with the fact we have just completed a data centre migration where we have had IFS built from scratch led me to think we could have a folder somewhere containing exported config files. However, the sender in my screenshots was only created on Friday so I know in this instance it wouldn’t be the case.Anyway, thanks for your quick response, really appreciated.Kind regards,Matt
Good afternoon,I’m wondering whether this solution eventually resolved your issue, I have a very similar request and am trying to understand the best route forward. Getting the Serial object into stock to be used with the CO does seem to be my problem also.Any advice you can impart would be most welcome.Many thanks,Matt
Hi, I can’t provide any guidance on your question but am keen to understand how you are embedding Qlik into IFS. We are currently on Apps8, moving to 10 this year. I also have sole responsibility of expanding our adoption of Qlik and this this would be a great way to push it under people’s noses.Any guidance would be gratefully received.Thanks,Matt
Hi Gianni, what issues are you experiencing.I am unlikely able to help but wonder whether they are the same issues I am experiencing.Many thanks,Matt
Thanks Mayura, that seems to have worked for me in our Test environment. Lots of work to do as I would imagine there any many component objects per work center.Are there any other considerations to be aware of, does this directly impact or influence anything else such as financials or anything else on the factory floor or engineering wise?Kindest regards,Matt
This appears to be a bug in our latest set of releases so have reverted to previous release.
Fab, thank you for this, I was just starting to explore measurements but this has made light work of what could have been a lot of messing around.
Thanks @paul harland ,Thanks for the quick response, think you’ve confirmed several of my conclusions. I thought it was straight forward for Sites.With regards to Companies, we are a manufacturing company and use the engineering module to capture internal maintenance work only. So not selling as a service, not using customers or sales parts etc. I would assume on this basis I should probably only need to worry about where the employee’s time is being recorded.Thanks again.Matt
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
