FYI: Was fixed in 23R2. Kind regardsAlex
Hi @Kasun Balasooriya ,are those parameters per user or global?Just to be sure as the Category as said “User Settings”. ThanksAlex
Hi @Ieva Rituma , sorry, for the late reply - yes, that perfectly fits my understanding - however, i wasn’t sure, because both modules having nearly the same functionality. ThanksAlex
Hi @TopMalinG , i analysed the issue for another customer.The issue is fixed with Bug-ID: 164888.This fix is included in UPD19. Please reach out to your support partner / IFS for single-patch delivery of the bugfix or the delivery of UPD19. ThanksAlex
@Sahan Wijerama Hi Sahan, does a guide-line regarding setup already exist?After seeing the video in the ifs-academy it seems to pretty straight-forward and worth a try.Regarding HR-Data for Travel-Expenses I’m fine, but for the Machine-Learning and the connection of both I’m not really sure how to set it up properly. Should it be done by a technical consultant or do I as a functional consultant get some kind of guidance here? Regarding modules / licenses: Is there anything additional needed to use the machine-learning part? ThanksAlex
Hi Sadeepa, the overall amount per identity (supplier) nevertheless needs to positive.From a functional point of view - You are sending money to the supplier. If the amount is negative you basically ask the bank to transfer money from the supplier to you and that is not working.I don’t think the solution is directly linked to your issue. Hope that helps getting a better understanding here. Kind regardsAlex
That won’t be feasible for all customers as some use a numbering scheme for their objects based on object-group and/or accounting-year/period, so it makes it not usable for another acquisition. This numbering scheme would be only used for the split-objects. However, i can not use an already existing object as a split object, because it always creates a new object. Problem is that the status is wrong and should be possible to clear / clean it up. ThanksAlex
Coming back to my question, is it a reporting issue or a process-issue?If it’s a reporting-issue, I could also imagine that you create a code-part-attribute “New GL-account” and give the account 5001-60-30 the attribute with the value 5002-60-30.If it’s more kind of a process-issue, then the question is, is the whole balance or only a part concerned and is it enough to transfer it for example on the 01.01.2022 or is needed to be transferred also in the past? Kind regardsAlex
Hello Alex, not aware of a standard-way in the client to do so. Only way I could imagine is via sql-script.But I would not recommend that.When it’s only reporting purposes, what about using attributes to give them a new “number” ? Kind regardsAlex
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
