Thank you very much, it now works as intended!
Hello again, I am still not sure how this helps? I want to use the RMB Email Invoice. Without changing the customer reference. Invoice to AR Contact for example and OC to Customer Reference. I don’t understand how a report rule changes this?
Thank you for the information, just what I was looking for. Do you mind sharing the Property list for email invoice & order conf as you showed?
Hello again,Unfortunately defining put away zones for this is not an option (it will be almost 2000 zones for the bay). Picking is not the priority. But the more you can try to always fill from 32 and down, the closer it will always be for the shipping department as it empties and gets refilled closer to 32. Thank you for your help in the matter.
Hopefully this explanation will clarify!We have a storage zone for Bay L15 Row 1-32 for several inventory parts. When production reports a full pallet. We want the transport task created to start filling the rows from 32 first and move towards 1. Since we use FIFO picking will be decided from that method. Route order is not applicable in our case. IFS should try to fill from 32 and move towards 1 in order to keep the rows closest to the shipping area filled before choosing rows with a lower number. From our point of view this creates an unwanted distance for the shipping department to move the goods. Setting up 32 storage zones and ranking them in Putaway Zones is not an option.
I see, then I guess the problem remains unsolved. Because your first suggestion is what we want. But it is not possible for us to maintain that and we cannot use it in the way you described. But we want the same thing as you described. Do you know what, besides the ranking decides where IFS puts the transport task? When we test, when have one storage zone for the entire row, 1-32. We can’t figure out what decides which location in the 1-32 the transport task chooses.
So this means that when creating a transport task, by using route order correctly, the transport task will select row (if empty) 32, then 31, then 30… etc. Or is route order only used when picking from the location?
Thank you for the answer. This is how I have set it up today but for the whole row. Because of how many different part numbers are being put in the rack I just want IFS to start filling the rack from row 32 and go to 1. Without setting 32 storage zones. Is that not possible?
Hello again, A follow up question. Our ideal situation is that some employees that we know always will work in the same team, let’s say A and team B. Team A ends their shift, and ends the ongoing operation for a quick daily service & mantenance. After that, they clock out and team B clocks in and a responsible person starts operation as Team B. What we want is Teams that can be “checked in” together to an operation, ongoing or not. Is this possible?
You can set the Resume Option for a Shop Floor EMployee to Automatic Resume. If the employee was automatically clocked out from a team (with ongoing work) when clocking out the previous day, he/she will be automatically joined back to this team when clocking in next day. Thank you Björn for the quick answer & explanation.
I found the problem. We kept our permission sets when upgrading from IFS 9 to 10. Since Handling Units is new for IFS 10, the user in question did not have permission to print the report “Handling Unit Content Label”. When giving this permission the problem was solved.
Since it is possible to print this from the handling units window I don’t think this is the issue. I am very curious as to why the report is not created in the Report Archive. I have not done this either and I get it to work. the only difference between the account that works and the one that does not, is permissions.
Hi Ibrahim,Both users use english. What is a bit odd is that when putting in hours from EE the project shows up and looks like mine. But when searching for it, mine shows up, users don’t.
I checked and the end user in question is active as an employee in both companies, same company as me and another company, both companies have active projects. There should be something visible then right? We do not use Permission Set filters.
Hello Ibrahim,Like me, the end user can add time from EE to projects, then it is visible in the app. That has been confirmed. The only thing the end user cannot do is find projects in the app. that is why I think it is permission related.
Hi Shenah, I have tried this now. No difference, as stated earlier it works for administrators, it is only for end users the problem occurs.
Hi Thanushi, We run IFS on premise, I checked the app configuration but we can’t configure anything from there. It is just blank. As stated earlier it works for me, but not end user. I think it is related to permissions.
Hello Subash,These are granted for the end user and for me. I was thinking that there must be other permissions that also need granting since it works for me but not for the end user.
Hello Ruwanjala,Thanks for the welcome!App version is 1.0, Assembly version is 1.0.2.0. Search the short name does not work either. The best would be if all the Projects the end user has access to shows up automatically, like it does for me as the administrator. Best Regards,Erik
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
