Checked in 22R2 version as well.This function works as expected there. Thus this should work in 23R2 since there was no major change in-between.
Hi all,Control Type Cost Codes is enabled for Posting Type TP3 which overtakes the Non-Inventory Purchase Transactions.M93 would be the final posting created when matching the supplier invoice for a Material Purchase and which will create a Work Task Transaction.These M93 posting will be overtaken by TP3 posting and the WIP accounts will be updated on that.M91 and M92 are the Non-inventory receipt and arrival transactions which will not be overtaken by Work task Transactions, but a cost line will only be created at arrival for invoicing purposes for customers if needed.Hope this clarifies your question.Thanks & best RegardsEreshacc @Mayura Wasantha @Thommy
Hi Tor, This has been implemented in 22R2.Further in 23R1 there was a similar functionality introduced on Work Tasks to print attachments along with the Work Task through “ Work Task Report Control” Best RegardsEresha
@CSL, I will get back on information for you to access the product information page.Replication is available in 23R2. There is a user Guide similar to AP 10 uploaded in the above mentioned link on what entities being replicated and not.
Let’s see if they have access to the Workplace. Other than that information is available in https://ifs.sharepoint.com/sites/IFSCloudProdInfo/SitePages/Oil-%26-Gas-Solution.aspx O&G extension functionality have been evaluated and some of them have been directly transitioned to IFS Cloud while others were redesigned to align with the core functionalities and industry requirements.
O&G extension is fully functional in IFS Cloud 23R2.Refer this workplace post for more information https://oneifs.workplace.com/groups/326011684612763/permalink/1463363657544221/
Hi,This element in the Maintenance Engineer is to display any unattended Sign-off Requirements (Inspector and Independent). Any entries in this tile will be displayed only once the Executor Sign off for a particular work task is signed off.This is relevant for Work Tasks with connection type Equipment. Hope this clarifies your question
Hi,You need to set up the Cost center and Object as the Logical code part for the relevant code parts to display Code part infor in Equipment Objects.
Hi Mingram,In IEE it sis possible to attach documents through the Attachment Panel as below for a Service Request.And for Aurena it is possible to connect a document to the Work Task created through the New Service Request option.APP 10 IEEApp 10 Aurena Hope this clarifies your question.Thanks & Best regards Eresha
Hi Kirk,These seems to be a valid request. @Martin Harris and @Stefan Pettersson FYI.Thanks & Best RegardsEresha.
Consequences on pm actions and work task generation from pm actions in customer production environments installing 23R1No impact on PM actions and WO generation. Sorry for the separate replies. Its hard to post lengthy replies.Get back if there are further concerns.Best Regards
Impact the change is giving on previous “IFS-standard” on work task transactions and posting analysis?There has not been any change to the existing Posting set-up and transactions. But new transactions were introduced to cater the scenarios of Time Reports done from Employees from other companies than Work Task company and Resource time reporting. This information is mentioned in News PPT for 22R2 Release.
Hi Harald,Please refer my answers below:Source of time/hour cost if no cost is added in resource groups?Costs are fetched using following logic and has not been changed due to the resource setup changes.If Use Labor cost used, the the Hourly salary defined in HR is used. If Use Labour cost is unticked, and Resource Group exists when reporting time. Cost of Resource Group is fetched. If no Resource Group is defined, then the hourly rate defined on the Maintenance Organization is fetched.Postings on time transactions when no cost center is added?Do you mean the cost center defined in Pre-Postings for the Work Task?
Hi,Could you please mention the process you followed. But if you have created an invoice and connected to a Work Task then cancelling the invoice and posting it to the relevant task would work. If the Purchase requisition was initiated from the Work Task then you need to revert back cancelling the invoice, any receipts associated and the Purchase Requisition. and then again create the requisition on the relevant task. Thanks & Best RegardsEresha
Hi djedaiB,Direct Issue in Tech portal caters material to be issued from Standard inventory and thus the Cost/revenue associated with the material issue will not reflect in the Project Activity.This is not a bug.Although there has been a request to enhance the direct issue capability to issue material from Project Inventory, R&D is currently investigating the possibility and might release that functionality in IFS Cloud 23R2 version.Hope this clarify your question.Thanks & Best RegardsEresha
Hi Rasika, It sis possible through Execute Work Task
Hi Rasika, I’m not sure which IFS version you are referring to.But in IFS App 10, through MY Work client it is possible to directly Issue material in Inventory without a planned Material line. When issued a cost line will be generated refereeing the material transaction. In IFS Cloud, this option is available in all Work Tasks clients though the Issue Material assistant through Issue New option.For Reservation there is no such option.But Returns can be handled the same way as Issues without having a planned return line.Hope this clarifies your question.Thanks & Best RegardsEresha
About the question raised here. Yes there has been a change so that a user can be connected to one Maint.Org of a site or to Multiple Maint.orgs (keeping the Maint.Org. field blank) and validations are made depending on that when planning a resource.Further when Time reporting user can specify the required Maint.Org and report time. We haven’t tried to autofill that with the Work Task Maintenance Organization, since it would be confusing in other reporting clients such Quick Report and Tech Portals.Hope this clarifies about the changes and appreciate your feedback. CC : @Thommy Thanks & Best RegardsEresha
With the Secondment for Assets feature in 22R2 release, the Maintenance and Service Specific definitions were moved towards the Resource level.With this feature the restriction of having an employee for time reporting was removed and time reporting was allowed for a Resource as well.Further the set-up catered to definition of a seconded employee. For example if the employee is employed in Company A and has to perform work in Company B. Earlier a dummy employee should be created to cater this requirement. But now it can be catered by defining the Active Secondment Employee. Continued….
Hi all,Prior to 22R2 the Maintenance definitions were per Employee. With that set-up it was possible to define only one Site and Main.org definition per employee but with the provision to use the connected resources in Work Tasks without any validation on the Maint.Org and Site connected. Continued in the next message…...
Currently I do not think there is a way to visualize them for Request connected Work Tasks. But there are some plans to incorporate a event log to track changes on the work task for the future releases.
Hi Elgo,As I read your question it seems like the requirement is it have free of charge for the service but sometimes you need to invoice the customer on specific aspects.You could create sale lines on the Work Task with the relevant charges and set the sales line to invoiceable.Then those will appear in the invoice preview and can be transfered to customer order.Hope this helps. Thanks & Best RegardsEresha
There is no plan for including Tool/equipment in the recent 2 or 3 releases.If there is a customer requirement please let us know we can consider it. Thanks & Best RegardsEresha
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
