Thank you @matt.watters I believe this will do what I’m looking for. I was also looking at creating product families for the different sizes and using a saved search against SORs to see which proposed SORs could be run together.
@dameenda Yes, the SO does create with the Phantom parts exploded, however IPAP still shows demand against the PN 123. That is what is creating confusion.
Thank you @CM6 What doesn’t make sense is that I have POs (no part POs) with a cost defined, however there is no planned cost. In other instances, I have POs (no part POs) with a cost defined and a Planned cost set. In each instance, the planned cost driver is defined as Connected Object. Shouldn’t they both show a Planned cost then?
@CM6 I don’t see an expected price on the PO or POR. What are you referring to? We would always fill out a price for the PO whether it was Part or No Part.
@Buddhika Kurera Where would I check Misc Demands for that Activity? On the Demand tab, I see both Misc. Parts and Misc. No Part, but I do not see anything under either tab.
I was able to identify how the costs were being allocated. Every WO that is connected that has a POR generated through the WO system is allocated as a planned cost vs. a PO directly connected via the POR system. The costs remain, as the PO/PORs advance in status and do not prevent closure, provided the POs are closed/invoiced. Thanks all for the guidance!
I was never able to find the command button to remove that from the wizard. In the end, I modified the permission set and removed all travel access. So, they can select the Travel button, but receive access denied when attempting to submit travel.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.