Currently, it is only possible to define a single email address for all supplier and customer emails - statements, invoices, payment advices (remittances), CIS deduction statements, orders etc. However, in reality this varies on a supplier/customer basis and very often multiple email addresses are used for a single type of document.It is possible to define this through configurations, but this is done in all implementations and all new prospects ask for this. Hence, more flexibility should be allowed in the Comm Method tabs or in report rules to select multiple types of comm method lines. It is very typical for different customers and suppliers have different setup requirements. E.g. for some suppliers/customers, the statements will be sent to a single email address, but for others it will go to multiple email addresses. The solution could be to introduce multiple generic checkboxes for “Report Type X” against the comm method tab:This allows for flexibility, because these can be renam
In the EE client, it was possible to execute a keyboard combination to move up and down records. CTRL + Up Arrow Previous Object CTRL + Down Arrow Next Object Our customers upgrading from the EE client are used to operate in this way and have asked for this to be brought back into Aurena as well. here is an example of the required (the keyboard shortcut should work in a single record screen and tabular screens):
I’ve come across a scenario for manual supplier invoice authorisation where an invoice is matched to a sub contract where retention applies and this has generated negative lines for the retention amounts. I’ve noticed that the amount on the posting seem to be absolute values, i.e. non-sign specific. For example, this rule will apply for all postings where the amounts are within -4999.99 and 4999.99 and I want to check if this is correct and it’s done by design?
Drill-down and a link back to IFS is available as core already for the GL Balance information source. However, we would like to enable the drill-down also to other information sources, including quick information sources. Is this possible? In Aurena, there is a place to set up the Information Source URL but has anyone got experience in setting this up manually for other Information Sources?
Currently, based on our testing we cannot find a way to create an overtime cost line using the Job Rate Management without it including also the base time. Ideally, for analysing the detail we’d like to see the overtime cost lines without a base cost element. It is not an option to create an overtime cost type as a fixed cost because any calculations (such as pension) which are based on base wage, would not get generated for overtime in that scenario. We are now getting two entries for overtime - one which is base and another which is the 50% addition to base, but ideally we’d want to be able to set this up to see only overtime entry at 150%. This would help with analysis and budget comparisons to keep base time lines separate from overtime. Has anyone come up with a solution?
A customer has asked whether it is possible to change the title of a document when it’s generated and the printed document is downloaded (e.g. a customer invoice, PO order confirmation etc.). The customer is trying to get IFS to use e.g. the invoice number, PO number etc. in the document title so that it’s easily searchable and it’s clear which document is what. Has anyone come across this requirement or seen a way to do this?
I’ve been asked whether IFS can consume cdf3 interface for credit card imports. Can’t see the term in IFS help nor technical documentation - can anyone please help with a definitive answer? Thank you
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.