Hi Jamie,The standard functionality is explained in a very detailed form in the two answers. To add more input to your query. Can I know the following input :A possible scenario (real time ) You mentioned move goods from paint store to a shop floor location ? This would mean your components to where the actual manufacturing and detailing is happening ?
I agree with the current response, the WIP report is to demark the existing shop orders which are work in progress. Only filtration points would be Site, Part, and Planner. If not a customized report would need to be created for this need.
I would like to have further input on the following to analyze a possible solution: Has the customer a solution more into replication. Example from a perspective of offshore and onshore? Is it more of an expansion of sites?Going through the input data provided:Setting up permission sets and also the use of presentation objects would certainly be able to sort the mentioned issue.
The brief you on the Part movement control functionality is as follows: Path : Inventory Part Basic data > Part availability controls All Allowed – The movement of parts (in general for all instances) to another location is allowed. Not Allowed – The part movement is restricted and the parts cannot be moved to any location unless the availability control ID is changed. The additional feature in application 10, is the column expiration date. Which makes it possible to set a valid period date for specific stock. (Inventory part in stock window). This feature further enhances the options. This feature can also be setup as mandatory. [ inventory part > Acquisition tab > you would find s check box] However, the requirement that you have raised for only Kanban not to consider the stock is not possible via the current functionalities. Meaning with the Not Allowed option even transport task will not be created. This could be raised to RND to further have their input as a enhancement r
Please consider going through the following solution provided by RND Solution ID 258649. This needs to be additionally considered. Test Plan: 1. Create a Purchase part in 2 sites. (SITE A, B) 2. Receive parts to a site. (to Site A) 3. In other site (Site B), create a kanban circuit for purchase part like follow. a. Replenish type = External Site b. Replenish source = Other Site (Site B) c. Replenish Order = Transport Task d. Signal Type = Electronic 4. Now create a Kanban card and set to circulate.(card id = XX) 5. Now create a Kanban replenishment request for bar code id created above (XX) (a transport task should create for the part) 6. Goto Kanban Report Supplier Report window and enter bar code id and execute transport task. Transport task should set to executed. 7. Now repeat the step 5 and 6 again. When execute step 6, you will received an error "No active Transport Task created from Kanban Replenishment Request for this Kanban card could be found". But this is wrong since there
More Feedback on the Topic- Some of the customers use the cancel option currently, as a delete button is not available. The issue is that, customers generate statistical reports based on the canceled NCR. (Number of canceled NCR) Hence, canceling such NCR will be incorrect in that sense. The best option would be to go for a customization which would be the best solution. Another option as mentioned, would be a custom field. However, my personal view would be a customization since that would be less complex.
Thank you for your questions. Let me explain it further, NISS and NREC is probably quicker than unreceiving and re-receiving POs, but I have to ask WHY. The point of FIFO is to carry receipt actual cost in inventory, but customer is wanting to do a Standard cost -like function. Should they be using Standard cost instead? If they using FIFO because they don't want any PPV, then they could also use Weighted Average valuation and accomplish the same thing. From another standpoint, Inventory Valuation for FIFO parts acts like a simple Weighted Average: total inventory value / sum of all quantities in stock. In the example you gave the Inventory valuation would be $7.50/part. Hope this clarifies your query.
Updating the cost set 2 and copying to cost set 1 will only change the Inventory values of Standard Cost - Cost per Part cost inventory value. If for instance you have added an overhead to a part cost template, you would need to: 1. Calculate costs and copy to Cost set 1 so that the OH is reflected in the Cost set 1 part cost template 2. Now the only way a user can update FIFO cost is to cancel a receipt and re-receive at the new cost.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.