Don’t understand the answer.I do get result when having them separately in the search field for code part name.I do get a result when having them both and pressing search button.So one again is this a good response in the Find part of the search field?
The observation is that in IEE the user gets to the page for the client in Aurena the user ends up in a search result with poor hit rate
Then the question did it became that?
Would the usability and performance be increased or decreased if the user can control the order by when executing the sql query to populate a client? In the present solution to my knowledge:Open the client Press search Use filter to do the order by In my vision:Open the client Add order by expression press search
Is this true? Usability = Tolerant parser
I do think the user also want to be able to control the order by when doing search.Order by column1 DESC, column2 ASC etc..Is that going to be possible in the Search Advance like this
This is a standard installation on 2021 R2
But I want to search on several columns and do order by on several columns not just one column
IFS App10Lobby in IFS IEE Lobby in Aurena same as in IEE but not translated, Why?
Ok, what about App10 IEE client it has the same sad behaviour I think
Do you know the bug id?
I don’t see the answer to my question in these documents.I was looking for some guidance how to set up disk/partitions, servers etc.I add some pictures to illustrate my question
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.