Hi @Upasari Is this bug available from App10 onwards? No chance to downport into App9 right? When you say “Refer bug ID 153897”, its not actually visible to us, customers right? Thanks, Asela Hi @Asela Munasinghe This issue has been fixed in both App9 and App10.
Hi @Benny Jensen Go to Warehouse Management > Quantity in Stock > Cleanup of InventoryEnter the delete parameters and click OK.
Hi,Please make sure you have run the Cleanup of Inventory job to remove the zero records in Inventory Part in Stock before trying to delete the locations. Deletion of Inventory Locations has been allowed even when there are Transport Tasks in Executed status. Refer bug ID 153897.
Hi,SODIFF+/- transactions are created at the time when SO is closed, they are generated when the actual SO cost is different that part cost.For instance, if you report more time that that was defined in routing, a SODIFF is created.
Hi,SODIFF+/- transactions are created at the time when SO is closed, they are generated when the actual SO cost is different that part cost.For instance if you report more time that that was defined in routing a SODIFF is created.
Hi,If you have HU capacity defined for a part, you will get the option to use HU capacity when packing in Inventory Part In Stock.
Hi, You can attach to handling units on Register Arrivals page with no capacity defined. Select the preferred HU Type ID and set the packing rule as ‘Single Handling Unit’.
Hi,The situation to end up with a negative cost has always been there when using Weighted Average and performing cancellations or returns.This is not a unique issue in IFS but the general behavior in the weighted average calculations.The common issue here is that when using WA and the customer has very different costs for the same part, they can end up with negative inventory value during the process when a part is returned at a higher PO value than the current inventory cost. If the customer has a wide range of costs for a specific part and they know that they will do cancellation of purchase order receipts or returns to supplier, they must be aware of the consequence of having negative inventory value. If they have this situation often and find it not acceptable, then maybe they shall reconsider the use of WA and use another valuation method instead.It is true that we cannot issue or move a part with a negative cost. This issue exists for almost all issues and deliveries. For example
Hi,Please check PART_SERIAL_CATALOG_TAB and LOT_BATCH_MASTER.
This might help.
Hi, First, run Aggregate Inventory Transactions Per Period. This is an irreversible process .You need to have statistics period defined for this. After execution, the data can be queried in Inventory Value Per Period window. This window shows only closing stock for each statistics period. Opening stock of a period is the closing stock of the previous period. Therefore check the closing stock of the previous period. On this window there are filters that would help you filter out the data you need. Regards,Upasari
Hi @astfarazt I faced the same issue. However the following steps worked for me.Sort creation time column descending. Click on the kebab button on creation time column and freeze the column. Then sort the created date column descending.
Hi @muellerjs14 ,Works fine for me. Hope you have enough stock in the picking location.
Hi,With the current design, it is impossible to add a Part number same as the Assortment ID or Node ID in an Assortment. This is due to a technical constraint and therefore the recommendation is to use different IDs for Parts and Nodes.
Hello,This is being developed for IFS Cloud 23R2 at the moment.Regards,Upasari
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
